Effect of Sitagliptin on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

Jennifer B. Green(Duke University), M. Angelyn Bethel(University of Oxford), Paul W. Armstrong(University of Alberta), John B. Buse(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Samuel S. Engel(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Jyotsna Garg(Duke University), Robert Josse(St. Michael's Hospital), Keith D. Kaufman(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Joerg Koglin(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Scott Korn(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), John M. Lachin(George Washington University), Darren K. McGuire(The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center), Michael Pencina(Duke University), Eberhard Standl, Peter P. Stein(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Shailaja Suryawanshi(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Frans Van de Werf(KU Leuven), Eric D. Peterson(Duke University), Rury R. Holman(University of Oxford)
New England Journal of Medicine
June 8, 2015
Cited by 2,584Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on the long-term effect on cardiovascular events of adding sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, to usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, we assigned 14,671 patients to add either sitagliptin or placebo to their existing therapy. Open-label use of antihyperglycemic therapy was encouraged as required, aimed at reaching individually appropriate glycemic targets in all patients. To determine whether sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo, we used a relative risk of 1.3 as the marginal upper boundary. The primary cardiovascular outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.0 years, there was a small difference in glycated hemoglobin levels (least-squares mean difference for sitagliptin vs. placebo, -0.29 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.32 to -0.27). Overall, the primary outcome occurred in 839 patients in the sitagliptin group (11.4%; 4.06 per 100 person-years) and 851 patients in the placebo group (11.6%; 4.17 per 100 person-years). Sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo for the primary composite cardiovascular outcome (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09; P<0.001). Rates of hospitalization for heart failure did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.20; P=0.98). There were no significant between-group differences in rates of acute pancreatitis (P=0.07) or pancreatic cancer (P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease, adding sitagliptin to usual care did not appear to increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization for heart failure, or other adverse events. (Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme; TECOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00790205.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis