Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective

Andrew R. Weeks(The University of Melbourne), Carla M. Sgrò(Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute), Andrew G. Young(Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), Richard Frankham(Macquarie University), Nicki J. Mitchell(The University of Western Australia), Kim A. Miller(Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute), Margaret Byrne, David Coates, Mark D. B. Eldridge(Australian Museum), Paul Sunnucks(Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute), Martin F. Breed(The University of Adelaide), Elizabeth A. James(Royal Botanic Garden Sydney), Ary A. Hoffmann(The University of Melbourne)
Evolutionary Applications
June 18, 2011
Cited by 915Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Translocations are being increasingly proposed as a way of conserving biodiversity, particularly in the management of threatened and keystone species, with the aims of maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function under the combined pressures of habitat fragmentation and climate change. Evolutionary genetic considerations should be an important part of translocation strategies, but there is often confusion about concepts and goals. Here, we provide a classification of translocations based on specific genetic goals for both threatened species and ecological restoration, separating targets based on 'genetic rescue' of current population fitness from those focused on maintaining adaptive potential. We then provide a framework for assessing the genetic benefits and risks associated with translocations and provide guidelines for managers focused on conserving biodiversity and evolutionary processes. Case studies are developed to illustrate the framework.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis