Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance surveillance of acute cardiac allograft rejection and characterisation of transplantation-associated myocardial injury: a pilot study

Chris Miller(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Josephine H. Naish(University of Manchester), Steven M. Shaw(University of Manchester), Nizar Yonan(University of Manchester), Simon G. Williams(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), David Clark(Wythenshawe Hospital), Paul Bishop, Mark Ainslie(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Alex Borg(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Glyn A. Coutts(The Christie Hospital), Geoff J.M. Parker(University of Manchester), Simon Ray(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Matthias Schmitt(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre)
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
July 19, 2014
Cited by 61Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serial surveillance endomyocardial biopsies are performed in patients who have recently undergone heart transplantation in order to detect acute cardiac allograft rejection (ACAR) before symptoms occur, however the biopsy process is associated with a number of limitations. This study aimed to prospectively and longitudinally evaluate the performance of multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for detecting and monitoring ACAR in the early phase post-transplant, and characterize graft recovery following transplantation. METHODS: All patients receiving a heart transplant at a single UK centre over a period of 25 months were approached within one month of transplantation. Multiparametric CMR was prospectively performed on the same day as biopsy on four separate occasions (6 weeks, 10 weeks, 15 weeks and 20 weeks post-transplant). CMR included assessment of global and regional ventricular function, myocardial tissue characterization (T1 mapping, T2 mapping, extracellular volume, LGE) and pixel-wise absolute myocardial blood flow quantification. CMR parameters were compared with biopsy findings. As is standard, grade 2R or higher ACAR was considered significant. RESULTS: 88 CMR-matched biopsies were performed in 22 patients. Eight (9%) biopsies in 5 patients demonstrated significant ACAR. Significant ACAR was associated with a reduction in circumferential strain (-12.7±2.5% vs. -13.7±3.6%, p=0.047) but there was considerable overlap between groups. Whilst trends were observed between ACAR and proposed CMR markers of oedema, particularly after adjusting for primary graft dysfunction, differences were not significant. Significant improvements were seen in markers of graft structure and contractility, oedema and microvascular function over the period studied, although few parameters normalised. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel insight into the myocardial injury associated with transplantation, and its recovery, however multiparametric CMR was not able to accurately detect ACAR during the early phase post-transplantation.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis