Phase II Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Green Tea Extract in Patients with High-Risk Oral Premalignant Lesions

Anne S. Tsao(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Diane Liu(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Jack W. Martin(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Xi-ming Tang(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), J. Jack Lee(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Adel K. El‐Naggar(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Ignacio I. Wistuba(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Kirk S. Culotta(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Li Mao(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Ann M. Gillenwater(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Yuko M. Sagesaka(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Waun Ki Hong(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Vassiliki A. Papadimitrakopoulou(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
Cancer Prevention Research
November 1, 2009
Cited by 250Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Epidemiologic and preclinical data support the oral cancer prevention potential of green tea extract (GTE). We randomly assigned patients with high-risk oral premalignant lesions (OPL) to receive GTE at 500, 750, or 1,000 mg/m(2) or placebo thrice daily for 12 weeks, evaluating biomarkers in baseline and 12-week biopsies. The OPL clinical response rate was higher in all GTE arms (n = 28; 50%) versus placebo (n = 11; 18.2%; P = 0.09) but did not reach statistical significance. However, the two higher-dose GTE arms [58.8% (750 and 1,000 mg/m(2)), 36.4% (500 mg/m(2)), and 18.2% (placebo); P = 0.03] had higher responses, suggesting a dose-response effect. GTE treatment also improved histology (21.4% versus 9.1%; P = 0.65), although not statistically significant. GTE was well tolerated, although higher doses increased insomnia/nervousness but produced no grade 4 toxicity. Higher mean baseline stromal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) correlated with a clinical (P = 0.04) but not histologic response. Baseline scores of other biomarkers (epithelial VEGF, p53, Ki-67, cyclin D1, and p16 promoter methylation) were not associated with a response or survival. Baseline p16 promoter methylation (n = 5) was associated with a shorter cancer-free survival. Stromal VEGF and cyclin D1 expression were downregulated in clinically responsive GTE patients and upregulated in nonresponsive patients at 12 weeks (versus at baseline). An extended (median, 27.5 months) follow-up showed a median time to oral cancer of 46.4 months. GTE may suppress OPLs, in part through reducing angiogenic stimulus (stromal VEGF). Higher doses of GTE may improve short-term (12-week) OPL outcome. The present results support longer-term clinical testing of GTE for oral cancer prevention.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis