Effects of Metformin Versus Glipizide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease

Jie Hong(Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Yifei Zhang(Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Shenghan Lai(Johns Hopkins University), Ankang Lv(Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Qing Su(Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Yan Dong(Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Zhiguang Zhou(Central South University), Weili Tang(Central South University), Jiajun Zhao(Shandong University), Lianqun Cui(Shandong University), Dajin Zou(Second Military Medical University), Wang Dawang(Wenzhou Medical University), Hong Li(Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital), Chao Liu(Jiangsu Province Hospital), WU Guo-ting(Tongji University), Jie Shen(Nanfang Hospital), Dalong Zhu(Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital), Weiqing Wang(Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Weifeng Shen(Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Guang Ning(Shanghai Jiao Tong University), on behalf of the SPREAD-DIMCAD Investigators
Diabetes Care
December 10, 2012
Cited by 357Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The two major classes of antidiabetic drugs, sulfonylureas and metformin, may differentially affect macrovascular complications and mortality in diabetic patients. We compared the long-term effects of glipizide and metformin on the major cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients who had a history of coronary artery disease (CAD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 304 type 2 diabetic patients with CAD, mean age = 63.3 years (range, 36-80 years), were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either glipizide (30 mg daily) or metformin (1.5 g daily) for 3 years. The primary end points were times to the composite of recurrent cardiovascular events, including death from a cardiovascular cause, death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or arterial revascularization. RESULTS: At the end of study drug administration, both groups achieved a significant decrease in the level of glycated hemoglobin (7.1% in the glipizide group and 7.0% in the metformin group). At a median follow-up of 5.0 years, 91 participants had developed 103 primary end points. Intention-to-treat analysis showed an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54 (95% CI 0.30-0.90; P = 0.026) for the composites of cardiovascular events among the patients that received metformin, compared with glipizide. The secondary end points and adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with metformin for 3 years substantially reduced major cardiovascular events in a median follow-up of 5.0 years compared with glipizide. Our results indicated a potential benefit of metformin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis