Oral Capecitabine Compared With Intravenous Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Large Phase III Study

Eric Van Cutsem(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Chris Twelves(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Jim Cassidy(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), David Allman(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Emilio Bajetta(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Michael Boyer(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), R. Bugat(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), M Findlay(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), S. Frings(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Michaela K. Jahn(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Joe McKendrick(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), B Osterwalder(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), G. Pérez-Manga(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Riccardo Rosso(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Philippe Rougier(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Wolff Schmiegel(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Jean‐François Seitz(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Paul Thompson(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), José María Viéitez(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Christof Weitzel(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Peter Harper(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
November 1, 2001
Cited by 1,036

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of orally administered capecitabine (Xeloda; Roche Laboratories, Inc, Nutley, NJ), a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate designed to mimic continuous fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion but with preferential activation at the tumor site, with that of intravenous (IV) 5-FU plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 602 patients to treatment with capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) administered twice daily days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks, or to the 4-weekly Mayo Clinic regimen (5-FU/LV) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The primary objective, to demonstrate at least equivalent response rates in the two treatment groups, was met. The overall response rate was 18.9% for capecitabine and 15.0% for 5-FU/LV. In the capecitabine and 5-FU/LV groups, respectively, median time to disease progression was 5.2 and 4.7 months (log-rank P =.65); median time to treatment failure was 4.2 and 4.0 months (log-rank P =.89); and median overall survival was 13.2 and 12.1 months (log-rank P =.33). The toxicity profiles of both treatments were typical of fluoropyrimidines. However, capecitabine led to significantly lower incidences (P <.00001) of stomatitis and alopecia, but a higher incidence of cutaneous hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001). Capecitabine also resulted in lower incidences (P <.00001) of grade 3/4 stomatitis and neutropenia, leading to a lower incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenic fever and sepsis. Only grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001) and uncomplicated grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia (P <.0001) were reported more frequently with capecitabine. CONCLUSION: Oral capecitabine achieved an at least equivalent efficacy compared with IV 5-FU/LV. Capecitabine demonstrated clinically meaningful safety advantages and the convenience of an oral agent.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis