Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane

Lars Morawietz(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), R.-A. Claßen(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Jörg Schröder(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Christian Dynybil(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Carsten Perka(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), A. Skwara(University Hospital Münster), J. Neidel, T. Gehrke(Helios Endo-Klinik Hamburg), Lars Frommelt(Helios Endo-Klinik Hamburg), Torsten Hansen(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), M. Otto(Trier University of Applied Sciences), B. Barden, T. Aigner(Universitätsklinikum Erlangen), P Stiehl(University Hospital Leipzig), Thomas Schubert(University Hospital Regensburg), C. Meyer-Scholten(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Anna König, Oliver Strobel(Universitätsklinikum Würzburg), C. Räder(Klinik König-Ludwig Haus), S. Kirschner(Klinik König-Ludwig Haus), F. Lintner(Otto Wagner Hospital), W. Rüther, I. Bos(University of Lübeck), Christian Hendrich, Jörg Kriegsmann(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), V. Krenn
Journal of Clinical Pathology
May 26, 2006
Cited by 259Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

AIMS: The introduction of clearly defined histopathological criteria for a standardised evaluation of the periprosthetic membrane, which can appear in cases of total joint arthroplasty revision surgery. METHODS: Based on histomorphological criteria, four types of periprosthetic membrane were defined: wear particle induced type (detection of foreign body particles; macrophages and multinucleated giant cells occupy at least 20% of the area; type I); infectious type (granulation tissue with neutrophilic granulocytes, plasma cells and few, if any, wear particles; type II); combined type (aspects of type I and type II occur simultaneously; type III); and indeterminate type (neither criteria for type I nor type II are fulfilled; type IV). The periprosthetic membranes of 370 patients (217 women, 153 men; mean age 67.6 years, mean period until revision surgery 7.4 years) were analysed according to the defined criteria. RESULTS: Frequency of histopathological membrane types was: type I 54.3%, type II 19.7%, type III 5.4%, type IV 15.4%, and not assessable 5.1%. The mean period between primary arthroplasty and revision surgery was 10.1 years for type I, 3.2 years for type II, 4.5 years for type III and 5.4 years for type IV. The correlation between histopathological and microbiological diagnosis was high (89.7%), and the inter-observer reproducibility sufficient (85%). CONCLUSION: The classification proposed enables standardised typing of periprosthetic membranes and may serve as a tool for further research on the pathogenesis of the loosening of total joint replacement. The study highlights the importance of non-infectious, non-particle induced loosening of prosthetic devices in orthopaedic surgery (membrane type IV), which was observed in 15.4% of patients.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis