Clinical Features and Outcome of Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Harbor <i>EML4-ALK</i>

Alice T. Shaw(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Beow Y. Yeap(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Mari Mino–Kenudson(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Subba R. Digumarthy(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Daniel B. Costa(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Rebecca S. Heist(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Benjamin Solomon(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Hannah Stubbs(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Sonal Admane(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Ultan McDermott(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Jeffrey Settleman(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Susumu Kobayashi(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Eugene J. Mark(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Scott J. Rodig(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Lucian R. Chirieac(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Eunice L. Kwak(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), Thomas J. Lynch(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre), A. John Iafrate(Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
August 10, 2009
Cited by 1,877Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: The EML4-ALK fusion oncogene represents a novel molecular target in a small subset of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). To aid in identification and treatment of these patients, we examined the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients who had NSCLC with and without EML4-ALK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSCLC were selected for genetic screening on the basis of two or more of the following characteristics: female sex, Asian ethnicity, never/light smoking history, and adenocarcinoma histology. EML4-ALK was identified by using fluorescent in situ hybridization for ALK rearrangements and was confirmed by immunohistochemistry for ALK expression. EGFR and KRAS mutations were determined by DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Of 141 tumors screened, 19 (13%) were EML4-ALK mutant, 31 (22%) were EGFR mutant, and 91 (65%) were wild type (WT/WT) for both ALK and EGFR. Compared with the EGFR mutant and WT/WT cohorts, patients with EML4-ALK mutant tumors were significantly younger (P < .001 and P = .005) and were more likely to be men (P = .036 and P = .039). Patients with EML4-ALK-positive tumors, like patients who harbored EGFR mutations, also were more likely to be never/light smokers compared with patients in the WT/WT cohort (P < .001). Eighteen of the 19 EML4-ALK tumors were adenocarcinomas, predominantly the signet ring cell subtype. Among patients with metastatic disease, EML4-ALK positivity was associated with resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Patients in the EML4-ALK cohort and the WT/WT cohort showed similar response rates to platinum-based combination chemotherapy and no difference in overall survival. CONCLUSION: EML4-ALK defines a molecular subset of NSCLC with distinct clinical characteristics. Patients who harbor this mutation do not benefit from EGFR TKIs and should be directed to trials of ALK-targeted agents.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis