Effects of uric acid-lowering therapy on renal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bhadran Bose(Princess Alexandra Hospital), Sunil V. Badve(The University of Queensland), Swapnil Hiremath(Ottawa Hospital), Neil Boudville(Kidney Health Australia), Fiona G. Brown(Kidney Health Australia), Alan Cass(Menzies School of Health Research), Janak de Zoysa(The University of Queensland), Robert G. Fassett(The University of Queensland), Randall Faull(Kidney Health Australia), David C.H. Harris(The University of Queensland), Carmel M. Hawley(The University of Queensland), John Kanellis(The University of Queensland), Suetonia C. Palmer(Kidney Health Australia), Vlado Perkovic(Kidney Health Australia), Elaine M. Pascoe(Kidney Health Australia), Gopala K. Rangan(The University of Sydney), Robert Walker(Kidney Health Australia), Giles Walters(The University of Queensland), David W. Johnson(Kidney Health Australia)
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
September 15, 2013
Cited by 221Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-randomized studies suggest an association between serum uric acid levels and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this systematic review is to summarize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the benefits and risks of uric acid-lowering therapy on renal outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Excerpta Medical Database and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched with English language restriction for RCTs comparing the effect of uric acid-lowering therapy with placebo/no treatment on renal outcomes. Treatment effects were summarized using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eight trials (476 participants) evaluating allopurinol treatment were eligible for inclusion. There was substantial heterogeneity in baseline kidney function, cause of CKD and duration of follow-up across these studies. In five trials, there was no significant difference in change in glomerular filtration rate from baseline between the allopurinol and control arms [mean difference (MD) 3.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -0.9, 7.1; heterogeneity χ2=1.9, I2=0%, P=0.75]. In three trials, allopurinol treatment abrogated increases in serum creatinine from baseline (MD -0.4 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.8, -0.0 mg/dL; heterogeneity χ2=3, I2=34%, P=0.22). Allopurinol had no effect on proteinuria and blood pressure. Data for effects of allopurinol therapy on progression to end-stage kidney disease and death were scant. Allopurinol had uncertain effects on the risks of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Uric acid-lowering therapy with allopurinol may retard the progression of CKD. However, adequately powered randomized trials are required to evaluate the benefits and risks of uric acid-lowering therapy in CKD.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis