Open Data, Open Source and Open Standards in chemistry: The Blue Obelisk five years on

Noel M. O’Boyle(University College Cork), Rajarshi Guha(Translational Therapeutics (United States)), Egon Willighagen(Karolinska Institutet), Sam Adams(University of Cambridge), Jonathan Alvarsson(Uppsala University), Jean‐Claude Bradley(Drexel University), Igor Filippov(Science Applications International Corporation (United States)), Robert M. Hanson(St. Olaf College), Marcus D. Hanwell(Kitware (United States)), Geoffrey Hutchison(University of Pittsburgh), Craig A. James, Nina Jeliazkova(IDEAconsult), Andrew Lang(Oral Roberts University), Karol M. Langner(Leiden University), David Lonie(University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Daniel M. Lowe(Unilever (United Kingdom)), Jérôme Pansanel(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Д. С. Павлов, Ola Spjuth(Uppsala University), Christoph Steinbeck(Wellcome Trust), Adam L. Tenderholt(Seattle University), Kevin J. Theisen, Peter Murray‐Rust(Unilever (United Kingdom))
Journal of Cheminformatics
October 14, 2011
Cited by 97Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Blue Obelisk movement was established in 2005 as a response to the lack of Open Data, Open Standards and Open Source (ODOSOS) in chemistry. It aims to make it easier to carry out chemistry research by promoting interoperability between chemistry software, encouraging cooperation between Open Source developers, and developing community resources and Open Standards. RESULTS: This contribution looks back on the work carried out by the Blue Obelisk in the past 5 years and surveys progress and remaining challenges in the areas of Open Data, Open Standards, and Open Source in chemistry. CONCLUSIONS: We show that the Blue Obelisk has been very successful in bringing together researchers and developers with common interests in ODOSOS, leading to development of many useful resources freely available to the chemistry community.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis