Dose-Dense Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial

Mark R. Gilbert(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Meihua Wang(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Kenneth Aldape(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Roger Stupp(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Monika E. Hegi(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Kurt A. Jaeckle(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Terri S. Armstrong(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Jeffrey S. Wefel(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Minhee Won(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Deborah T. Blumenthal(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Anita Mahajan(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Christopher J. Schultz(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Sara Erridge(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Brigitta G. Baumert(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Kristen I. Hopkins(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Tzahala Tzuk-Shina(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Paul D. Brown(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Arnab Chakravarti(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Walter J. Curran(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Minesh P. Mehta(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
October 7, 2013
Cited by 1,074Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is the standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status may be an important determinant of treatment response. Dose-dense (DD) temozolomide results in prolonged depletion of MGMT in blood mononuclear cells and possibly in tumor. This trial tested whether DD temozolomide improves overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase III trial enrolled patients older than age 18 years with a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 60 with adequate tissue. Stratification included clinical factors and tumor MGMT methylation status. Patients were randomly assigned to standard temozolomide (arm 1) or DD temozolomide (arm 2) for 6 to 12 cycles. The primary end point was OS. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of MGMT status. RESULTS: A total of 833 patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 or arm 2 (1,173 registered). No statistically significant difference was observed between arms for median OS (16.6 v 14.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P = .63) or median PFS (5.5 v 6.7 months; HR, 0.87; P = .06). Efficacy did not differ by methylation status. MGMT methylation was associated with improved OS (21.2 v 14 months; HR, 1.74; P < .001), PFS (8.7 v 5.7 months; HR, 1.63; P < .001), and response (P = .012). There was increased grade ≥ 3 toxicity in arm 2 (34% v 53%; P < .001), mostly lymphopenia and fatigue. CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate improved efficacy for DD temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM, regardless of methylation status. However, it did confirm the prognostic significance of MGMT methylation. Feasibility of large-scale accrual, prospective tumor collection, and molecular stratification was demonstrated.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis