Everolimus for Previously Treated Advanced Gastric Cancer: Results of the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III GRANITE-1 Study

Atsushi Ohtsu(Center for Cancer Research), Jaffer A. Ajani(Center for Cancer Research), Yu-Xian Bai(Center for Cancer Research), Yung‐Jue Bang(Center for Cancer Research), Hyun Cheol Chung(Yonsei University), Hong-Ming Pan(Center for Cancer Research), Tarek Sahmoud(Center for Cancer Research), Lin Shen(Center for Cancer Research), Kun‐Huei Yeh(Center for Cancer Research), Keisho Chìn(Center for Cancer Research), Kei Muro(Center for Cancer Research), Yeul Hong Kim(Center for Cancer Research), David Ferry(Center for Cancer Research), Niall C. Tebbutt(Center for Cancer Research), Salah‐Eddin Al‐Batran(Krankenhaus Nordwest), Heind Smith(Center for Cancer Research), Chiara Costantini(Center for Cancer Research), Syed Rizvi(Center for Cancer Research), David Lebwohl(Center for Cancer Research), Eric Van Cutsem(Center for Cancer Research)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
September 17, 2013
Cited by 492Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: The oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus demonstrated promising efficacy in a phase II study of pretreated advanced gastric cancer. This international, double-blind, phase III study compared everolimus efficacy and safety with that of best supportive care (BSC) in previously treated advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced gastric cancer that progressed after one or two lines of systemic chemotherapy were randomly assigned to everolimus 10 mg/d (assignment schedule: 2:1) or matching placebo, both given with BSC. Randomization was stratified by previous chemotherapy lines (one v two) and region (Asia v rest of the world [ROW]). Treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, and safety. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-six patients (median age, 62.0 years; 73.6% male) were enrolled. Median OS was 5.4 months with everolimus and 4.3 months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.08; P = .124). Median PFS was 1.7 months and 1.4 months in the everolimus and placebo arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.78). Common grade 3/4 adverse events included anemia, decreased appetite, and fatigue. The safety profile was similar in patients enrolled in Asia versus ROW. CONCLUSION: Compared with BSC, everolimus did not significantly improve overall survival for advanced gastric cancer that progressed after one or two lines of previous systemic chemotherapy. The safety profile observed for everolimus was consistent with that observed for everolimus in other cancers.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis