Intrapleural Use of Tissue Plasminogen Activator and DNase in Pleural Infection

Najib M. Rahman(Churchill Hospital), Nicholas A. Maskell(Southmead Hospital), Alex West(Medway Maritime Hospital), R Teoh(Castle Hill Hospital), Anthony Arnold(Castle Hill Hospital), Carolyn Mackinlay(Great Western Hospital), D. Peckham(St James's University Hospital), Chris Davies(Royal Berkshire Hospital), Nabeel Ali(Kings Mill Hospital), William Kinnear(Queen's Medical Centre), Andrew Bentley(Wythenshawe Hospital), Brennan C Kahan(Medical Research Council), John Wrightson(Churchill Hospital), Helen Davies(Churchill Hospital), Clare Hooper(Southmead Hospital), Gary Lee(The University of Western Australia), Emma Hedley(Churchill Hospital), Nicky Crosthwaite(Churchill Hospital), Louise Choo(Medical Research Council), Emma Helm(National Health Service), Fergus Gleeson(National Health Service), Andrew Nunn(Medical Research Council), Robert J.O. Davies(Churchill Hospital)
New England Journal of Medicine
August 10, 2011
Cited by 841

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than 30% of patients with pleural infection either die or require surgery. Drainage of infected fluid is key to successful treatment, but intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy did not improve outcomes in an earlier, large, randomized trial. METHODS: We conducted a blinded, 2-by-2 factorial trial in which 210 patients with pleural infection were randomly assigned to receive one of four study treatments for 3 days: double placebo, intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and DNase, t-PA and placebo, or DNase and placebo. The primary outcome was the change in pleural opacity, measured as the percentage of the hemithorax occupied by effusion, on chest radiography on day 7 as compared with day 1. Secondary outcomes included referral for surgery, duration of hospital stay, and adverse events. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) change in pleural opacity was greater in the t-PA-DNase group than in the placebo group (-29.5±23.3% vs. -17.2±19.6%; difference, -7.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.4 to -2.4; P=0.005); the change observed with t-PA alone and with DNase alone (-17.2±24.3 and -14.7±16.4%, respectively) was not significantly different from that observed with placebo. The frequency of surgical referral at 3 months was lower in the t-PA-DNase group than in the placebo group (2 of 48 patients [4%] vs. 8 of 51 patients [16%]; odds ratio for surgical referral, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.87; P=0.03) but was greater in the DNase group (18 of 46 patients [39%]) than in the placebo group (odds ratio, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.30 to 9.75; P=0.01). Combined t-PA-DNase therapy was associated with a reduction in the hospital stay, as compared with placebo (difference, -6.7 days; 95% CI, -12.0 to -1.9; P=0.006); the hospital stay with either agent alone was not significantly different from that with placebo. The frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intrapleural t-PA-DNase therapy improved fluid drainage in patients with pleural infection and reduced the frequency of surgical referral and the duration of the hospital stay. Treatment with DNase alone or t-PA alone was ineffective. (Funded by an unrestricted educational grant to the University of Oxford from Roche UK and by others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN57454527.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis