Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma

Bruce D. Cheson(BC Cancer Agency), Beate Pfistner(BC Cancer Agency), Malik E. Juweid(BC Cancer Agency), Randy D. Gascoyne(BC Cancer Agency), Lena Specht(BC Cancer Agency), Sandra J. Horning(BC Cancer Agency), Bertrand Coiffier(BC Cancer Agency), Richard I. Fisher(BC Cancer Agency), Anton Hagenbeek(BC Cancer Agency), Emanuele Zucca(BC Cancer Agency), Steven T. Rosen(BC Cancer Agency), Sigrid Stroobants(BC Cancer Agency), T. Andrew Lister(BC Cancer Agency), Richard T. Hoppe(BC Cancer Agency), Martin Dreyling(BC Cancer Agency), Kensei Tobinai(BC Cancer Agency), Julie M. Vose(BC Cancer Agency), Joseph M. Connors(BC Cancer Agency), Massimo Federico(BC Cancer Agency), Volker Diehl(BC Cancer Agency)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
January 22, 2007
Cited by 4,441Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Standardized response criteria are needed to interpret and compare clinical trials and for approval of new therapeutic agents by regulatory agencies. METHODS: The International Working Group response criteria (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol 17:1244, 1999) were widely adopted, but required reassessment because of identified limitations and the increased use of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and flow cytometry. The International Harmonization Project was convened to provide updated recommendations. RESULTS: New guidelines are presented incorporating PET, IHC, and flow cytometry for definitions of response in non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Standardized definitions of end points are provided. CONCLUSION: We hope that these guidelines will be adopted widely by study groups, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and regulatory agencies to facilitate the development of new and more effective therapies to improve the outcome of patients with lymphoma.


Related Papers