A Biologic Definition of Burkitt's Lymphoma from Transcriptional and Genomic Profiling

Michael Hummel(Franklin University), Stefan Bentink(Franklin University), Hilmar Berger(Franklin University), Wolfgang Hiddemann(Franklin University), Swen Weßendorf(Franklin University), Thomas F.E. Barth(Franklin University), Heinz‐Wolfram Bernd(Franklin University), Sergio Cogliatti(Franklin University), Judith Dierlamm(Franklin University), Alfred C. Feller(Franklin University), Martin‐Leo Hansmann(Franklin University), Eugenia Haralambieva(Franklin University), Lana Harder(Franklin University), Dirk Hasenclever(Franklin University), Michael W.M. Kühn(Franklin University), Dido Lenze(Franklin University), Peter Lichter(Franklin University), José I. Martín‐Subero(Franklin University), Peter Mӧller(Franklin University), Hans-Konrad Müller-Hermelink(Franklin University), German Ott(Franklin University), Reza Parwaresch(Franklin University), Christiane Pott(Franklin University), Andreas Rosenwald(Franklin University), Maciej Rosołowski(Franklin University), Carsten Schwäenen(Franklin University), Benjamin Stürzenhofecker(Franklin University), Monika Szczepanowski(Franklin University), Heiko Trautmann(Franklin University), Hans‐Heinrich Wacker(Franklin University), Rainer Spang(Franklin University), Markus Loeffler(Franklin University), Lorenz Trümper(Franklin University), Harald Stein(Franklin University), Reiner Siebert(Franklin University)
New England Journal of Medicine
June 7, 2006
Cited by 1,009Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The distinction between Burkitt's lymphoma and diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma is unclear. We used transcriptional and genomic profiling to define Burkitt's lymphoma more precisely and to distinguish subgroups in other types of mature aggressive B-cell lymphomas. METHODS: We performed gene-expression profiling using Affymetrix U133A GeneChips with RNA from 220 mature aggressive B-cell lymphomas, including a core group of 8 Burkitt's lymphomas that met all World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. A molecular signature for Burkitt's lymphoma was generated, and chromosomal abnormalities were detected with interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and array-based comparative genomic hybridization. RESULTS: We used the molecular signature for Burkitt's lymphoma to identify 44 cases: 11 had the morphologic features of diffuse large-B-cell lymphomas, 4 were unclassifiable mature aggressive B-cell lymphomas, and 29 had a classic or atypical Burkitt's morphologic appearance. Also, five did not have a detectable IG-myc Burkitt's translocation, whereas the others contained an IG-myc fusion, mostly in simple karyotypes. Of the 176 lymphomas without the molecular signature for Burkitt's lymphoma, 155 were diffuse large-B-cell lymphomas. Of these 155 cases, 21 percent had a chromosomal breakpoint at the myc locus associated with complex chromosomal changes and an unfavorable clinical course. CONCLUSIONS: Our molecular definition of Burkitt's lymphoma clarifies and extends the spectrum of the WHO criteria for Burkitt's lymphoma. In mature aggressive B-cell lymphomas without a gene signature for Burkitt's lymphoma, chromosomal breakpoints at the myc locus were associated with an adverse clinical outcome.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis