Outcome of High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Azacitidine Treatment Failure

Thomas Prébet(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Steven D. Gore(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Benjamin Esterni(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Claude Gardin(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Raphaël Itzykson(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Sylvain Thépot(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), François Dreyfus(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Odile Beyne Rauzy(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Christian Récher(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Lionel Adès(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Bruno Quesnel(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), C.L. Beach(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Pierre Fenaux(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center), Norbert Vey(Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
July 26, 2011
Cited by 478Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Azacitidine (AZA) is the current standard of care for high-risk (ie, International Prognostic Scoring System high or intermediate 2) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but most patients will experience primary or secondary treatment failure. The outcome of these patients has not yet been described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 435 patients with high-risk MDS and former refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-T) were evaluated for outcome after AZA failure. The cohort of patients included four data sets (ie, AZA001, J9950, and J0443 trials and the French compassionate use program). RESULTS: The median follow-up after AZA failure was 15 months. The median overall survival was 5.6 months, and the 2-year survival probability was 15%. Increasing age, male sex, high-risk cytogenetics, higher bone marrow blast count, and the absence of prior hematologic response to AZA were associated with significantly worse survival in multivariate analysis. Data on treatment administered after AZA failure were available for 270 patients. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation and investigational agents were associated with a better outcome when compared with conventional clinical care. CONCLUSION: Outcome after AZA failure is poor. Our results should serve as a basis for designing second-line clinical trials in this population.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis