Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist

Marti J. Anderson(Massey University), Thomas O. Crist(Miami University), Jonathan M. Chase(Washington University in St. Louis), Mark Vellend(University of British Columbia), Brian D. Inouye(Florida State University), Amy L. Freestone(Temple University), Nathan J. Sanders(University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Howard V. Cornell(University of California, Davis), Liza S. Comita(National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis), Kendi F. Davies(University of Colorado Boulder), Susan Harrison(University of California, Davis), Nathan J. B. Kraft(University of British Columbia), James Stegen(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Nathan G. Swenson(Michigan State University)
Ecology Letters
November 11, 2010
Cited by 2,418Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

A recent increase in studies of β diversity has yielded a confusing array of concepts, measures and methods. Here, we provide a roadmap of the most widely used and ecologically relevant approaches for analysis through a series of mission statements. We distinguish two types of β diversity: directional turnover along a gradient vs. non-directional variation. Different measures emphasize different properties of ecological data. Such properties include the degree of emphasis on presence/absence vs. relative abundance information and the inclusion vs. exclusion of joint absences. Judicious use of multiple measures in concert can uncover the underlying nature of patterns in β diversity for a given dataset. A case study of Indonesian coral assemblages shows the utility of a multi-faceted approach. We advocate careful consideration of relevant questions, matched by appropriate analyses. The rigorous application of null models will also help to reveal potential processes driving observed patterns in β diversity.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis