TERT Promoter Mutations Are a Major Indicator of Poor Outcome in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas

Miguel Melo(Universidade do Porto), Adriana Gaspar da Rocha(Universidade do Porto), João Vinagre(Universidade do Porto), Rui Batısta(Universidade do Porto), Joana Peixoto(Universidade do Porto), Catarina Tavares(Universidade do Porto), Ricardo Celestino(Universidade do Porto), Ana Paula de Almeida(Universidade do Porto), Catarina Salgado(Universidade do Porto), Catarina Eloy(Universidade do Porto), Patrícia Castro(Universidade do Porto), Hugo Prazeres(Universidade do Porto), Jorge Lima(Universidade do Porto), Teresina Amaro(Hospital Pedro Hispano), Cláudia Lobo(Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil), Maria João Martins(University of Coimbra), Margarida M. Moura(University of Lisbon), Branca Cavaco(University of Lisbon), Valeriano Leite(Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil), José Cameselle-Teijeiro(Servicio Gallego de Salud), Francisco Carrilho, Manuela Carvalheiro(University of Coimbra), Valdemar Máximo(Universidade do Porto), Manuel Sobrinho‐Simões(Universidade do Porto), Paula Soares(Universidade do Porto)
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
January 29, 2014
Cited by 544Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

CONTEXT: Telomerase promoter mutations (TERT) were recently described in follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinomas (FCDTC) and seem to be more prevalent in aggressive cancers. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the frequency of TERT promoter mutations in thyroid lesions and to investigate the prognostic significance of such mutations in a large cohort of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTCs). DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: We studied 647 tumors and tumor-like lesions. A total of 469 patients with FCDTC treated and followed in five university hospitals were included. Mean follow-up (±SD) was 7.8 ± 5.8 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictive value of TERT promoter mutations for distant metastasization, disease persistence at the end of follow-up, and disease-specific mortality. RESULTS: TERT promoter mutations were found in 7.5% of papillary carcinomas (PTCs), 17.1% of follicular carcinomas, 29.0% of poorly differentiated carcinomas, and 33.3% of anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. Patients with TERT-mutated tumors were older (P < .001) and had larger tumors (P = .002). In DTCs, TERT promoter mutations were significantly associated with distant metastases (P < .001) and higher stage (P < .001). Patients with DTC harboring TERT promoter mutations were submitted to more radioiodine treatments (P = .009) with higher cumulative dose (P = .004) and to more treatment modalities (P = .001). At the end of follow-up, patients with TERT-mutated DTCs were more prone to have persistent disease (P = .001). TERT promoter mutations were significantly associated with disease-specific mortality [in the whole FCDTC (P < .001)] in DTCs (P < .001), PTCs (P = .001), and follicular carcinomas (P < .001). After adjusting for age at diagnosis and gender, the hazard ratio was 10.35 (95% confidence interval 2.01-53.24; P = .005) in DTC and 23.81 (95% confidence interval 1.36-415.76; P = .03) in PTCs. CONCLUSIONS: TERT promoter mutations are an indicator of clinically aggressive tumors, being correlated with worse outcome and disease-specific mortality in DTC. TERT promoter mutations have an independent prognostic value in DTC and, notably, in PTC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis