Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines on anaemia management in chronic kidney disease: a European Renal Best Practice position statement

Francesco Locatelli(Alessandro Manzoni Hospital), Peter Bárány(Karolinska Institutet), Adrian Covic(Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy), Angel de Francisco(Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital), Lucia Del Vecchio(Alessandro Manzoni Hospital), David Goldsmith(Kings Health Partners), Walter H. Hörl(Medical University of Vienna), Gérard M. London(Inserm), Raymond Vanholder(Ghent University Hospital), Wim Van Biesen(Ghent University Hospital), Daniel Abramovicz(Ghent University Hospital), Jorge B. Cannata‐Andía, Pierre Cochat(Karolinska Institutet), Kai‐Uwe Eckardt, Denis Fouque(Ghent University Hospital), Olof Heimbürger(Ghent University Hospital), Kitty J. Jager, S. Jenkins(Ghent University Hospital), Elizabeth Lindley(Ghent University Hospital), Alison M. MacLeod, Anna Martí-Monrós, James Tattersall, Andrzej Więcek, C. Wanner(Alessandro Manzoni Hospital)
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
April 12, 2013
Cited by 470Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Recently, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) group has produced comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for the management of anaemia in CKD patients. These guidelines addressed all of the important points related to anaemia management in CKD patients, including therapy with erythropoieis stimulating agents (ESA), iron therapy, ESA resistance and blood transfusion use. Because most guidelines were 'soft' rather than 'strong', and because global guidelines need to be adapted and implemented into the regional context where they are used, on behalf of the European Renal Best Practice Advisory Board some of its members, and other external experts in this field, who were not participants in the KDIGO guidelines group, were invited to participate in this anaemia working group to examine and comment on the KDIGO documents in this position paper. In this article, the group concentrated only on those guidelines which we considered worth amending or adapting. All guidelines not specifically mentioned are fully endorsed.


Related Papers