Induction Chemotherapy and Dose Intensification of the Radiation Boost in Locally Advanced Anal Canal Carcinoma: Final Analysis of the Randomized UNICANCER ACCORD 03 Trial

D. Peiffert(Université Gustave Eiffel), L. Tournier-Rangeard(Université Gustave Eiffel), Jean‐Pierre Gérard(Université Gustave Eiffel), C. Lemanski(Université Gustave Eiffel), Éric François(Université Gustave Eiffel), Marc Giovannini(Université Gustave Eiffel), F. Cvitkovic(Université Gustave Eiffel), X. Mirabel(Université Gustave Eiffel), Olivier Bouché(Université Gustave Eiffel), Élisabeth Luporsi(Université Gustave Eiffel), Thierry Conroy(Université Gustave Eiffel), C. Montoto-Grillot(Université Gustave Eiffel), F. Mornex(Université Gustave Eiffel), Antoine Lusinchi(Université Gustave Eiffel), Jean‐Michel Hannoun‐Lévi(Université Gustave Eiffel), Jean‐François Seitz(Université Gustave Eiffel), Antoine Adenis(Université Gustave Eiffel), Christophe Hennequin(Université Gustave Eiffel), Bernard Denis(Université Gustave Eiffel), Michel Ducreux(Université Gustave Eiffel)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
April 24, 2012
Cited by 376Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Purpose Concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCT) is the standard for locally advanced anal canal carcinoma (LAACC). Questions regarding the role of induction chemotherapy (ICT) and a higher radiation dose in LAACC are pending. Our trial was designed to determine whether dose escalation of the radiation boost or two cycles of ICT before concomitant RCT lead to an improvement in colostomy-free survival (CFS). Patients and Methods Patients with tumors ≥ 40 mm, or < 40 mm and N1-3M0 were randomly assigned to one of four treatment arms: (A) two ICT cycles (fluorouracil 800 mg/m 2 /d intravenous [IV] infusion, days 1 through 4 and 29 to 32; and cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 IV, on days 1 and 29), RCT (45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, fluorouracil and cisplatin during weeks 1 and 5), and standard-dose boost (SD; 15 Gy); (B) two ICT cycles, RCT, and high-dose boost (HD; 20-25 Gy); (C): RCT and SD boost (reference arm); and (D) RCT and HD boost. Results Two hundred eighty-three of 307 patients achieved full treatment. With a median follow-up period of 50 months, the 5-year CFS rates were 69.6%, 82.4%, 77.1%, and 72.7% in arms A, B, C, and D, respectively. Considering the 2 × 2 factorial analysis, the 5-year CFS was 76.5% versus 75.0% (P = .37) in groups A and B versus C and D, respectively (ICT effect), and 73.7% versus 77.8% in groups A and C versus B and D, respectively (RT-dose effect; P = .067). Conclusion Using CFS as our main end point, we did not find an advantage for either ICT or HD radiation boost in LAACC. Nevertheless, the results of the most treatment-intense arm B should prompt the design of further intensification studies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis