Bortezomib or High-Dose Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Paul G. Richardson(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Pieter Sonneveld(Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences), Michael W. Schuster(NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital), David Irwin, Edward A. Stadtmauer(University of Pennsylvania), Thierry Façon(Hôpital Claude Huriez), Jean‐Luc Harousseau, Dina Ben‐Yehuda(Hadassah Academic College), Sagar Lonial(Emory University), Hartmut Goldschmidt(University Hospital Heidelberg), Donna Reece(Princess Margaret Hospital), Jesús F. San Miguel(Complejo Hospitalario de Salamanca), Joan Bladé(Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer), Mario Boccadoro(University of Turin), Jamie Cavenagh(St Bartholomew's Hospital), William S. Dalton(Moffitt Cancer Center), Anthony Boral(Millennium Engineering and Integration (United States)), Dixie Esseltine(Millennium Engineering and Integration (United States)), Jane Porter(Millennium Engineering and Integration (United States)), David P. Schenkein(Millennium Engineering and Integration (United States)), Kenneth C. Anderson(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)
New England Journal of Medicine
June 15, 2005
Cited by 2,494Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compared bortezomib with high-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who had received one to three previous therapies. METHODS: We randomly assigned 669 patients with relapsed myeloma to receive either an intravenous bolus of bortezomib (1.3 mg per square meter of body-surface area) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for eight three-week cycles, followed by treatment on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for three five-week cycles, or high-dose dexamethasone (40 mg orally) on days 1 through 4, 9 through 12, and 17 through 20 for four five-week cycles, followed by treatment on days 1 through 4 for five four-week cycles. Patients who were assigned to receive dexamethasone were permitted to cross over to receive bortezomib in a companion study after disease progression. RESULTS: Patients treated with bortezomib had higher response rates, a longer time to progression (the primary end point), and a longer survival than patients treated with dexamethasone. The combined complete and partial response rates were 38 percent for bortezomib and 18 percent for dexamethasone (P<0.001), and the complete response rates were 6 percent and less than 1 percent, respectively (P<0.001). Median times to progression in the bortezomib and dexamethasone groups were 6.22 months (189 days) and 3.49 months (106 days), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; P<0.001). The one-year survival rate was 80 percent among patients taking bortezomib and 66 percent among patients taking dexamethasone (P=0.003), and the hazard ratio for overall survival with bortezomib was 0.57 (P=0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 75 percent of patients treated with bortezomib and in 60 percent of those treated with dexamethasone. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib is superior to high-dose dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have had a relapse after one to three previous therapies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis