Reliability and validity of a brief physical activity-assessment for use by family physicians

Alison L. Marshall(The University of Queensland), Ben J. Smith(The University of Sydney), Adrian Bauman(The University of Sydney), Kaur, Sandeep(The University of Sydney)
QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)
January 1, 2005
Cited by 256Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment tool suitable for doctors to use to identify inactive patients in the primary care setting. Methods: Volunteer family doctors (n = 8) screened consenting patients (n = 75) for physical activity participation using a brief physical activity assessment tool. Inter-rater reliability was assessed within one week (n = 71). Validity was assessed against an objective physical activity monitor (computer science and applications accelerometer; n = 42). Results: The brief physical activity assessment tool produced repeatable estimates of ‘‘sufficient total physical activity’’, correctly classifying over 76% of cases (k 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.72). The validity coefficient was reasonable (k 0.40, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.69), with good percentage agreement (71%). Conclusions: The brief physical activity assessment tool is a reliable instrument, with validity similar to that of more detailed self report measures of physical activity. It is a tool that can be used efficiently in routine primary healthcare services to identify insufficiently active patients who may need physical activity advice.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis