Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease

Lawrence J. Appel(Johns Hopkins University), Jackson T. Wright(Case Western Reserve University), Tom Greene(University of Utah), Lawrence Y. Agodoa(National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases), Brad C. Astor(Johns Hopkins University), George L. Bakris(University of Chicago), W. H. Cleveland(Morehouse School of Medicine), Jeanne Charleston(Johns Hopkins University), Gabriel Contreras(University of Miami), Marquetta Faulkner(Meharry Medical College), Francis B. Gabbai(University of California, San Diego), Jennifer Gassman(Cleveland Clinic), Lee A. Hebert(The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center), Kenneth Jamerson(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), Joel D. Kopple(Harbor–UCLA Medical Center), John W. Kusek(National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases), James P. Lash(University of Illinois Chicago), Janice P. Lea(Emory University), Julia B. Lewis(Vanderbilt University), Michael S. Lipkowitz(Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), Shaul G. Massry(University of Southern California), Edgar R. Miller(Johns Hopkins University), Keith C. Norris(Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science), Robert A. Phillips(University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School), Velvie A. Pogue(Columbia University), Otelio S. Randall(Howard University), Stephen G. Rostand(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Miroslaw Smogorzewski(University of Southern California), Robert D. Toto(The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center), Xuelei Wang(Cleveland Clinic)
New England Journal of Medicine
September 1, 2010
Cited by 714Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In observational studies, the relationship between blood pressure and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is direct and progressive. The burden of hypertension-related chronic kidney disease and ESRD is especially high among black patients. Yet few trials have tested whether intensive blood-pressure control retards the progression of chronic kidney disease among black patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1094 black patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease to receive either intensive or standard blood-pressure control. After completing the trial phase, patients were invited to enroll in a cohort phase in which the blood-pressure target was less than 130/80 mm Hg. The primary clinical outcome in the cohort phase was the progression of chronic kidney disease, which was defined as a doubling of the serum creatinine level, a diagnosis of ESRD, or death. Follow-up ranged from 8.8 to 12.2 years. RESULTS: During the trial phase, the mean blood pressure was 130/78 mm Hg in the intensive-control group and 141/86 mm Hg in the standard-control group. During the cohort phase, corresponding mean blood pressures were 131/78 mm Hg and 134/78 mm Hg. In both phases, there was no significant between-group difference in the risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio in the intensive-control group, 0.91; P=0.27). However, the effects differed according to the baseline level of proteinuria (P=0.02 for interaction), with a potential benefit in patients with a protein-to-creatinine ratio of more than 0.22 (hazard ratio, 0.73; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In overall analyses, intensive blood-pressure control had no effect on kidney disease progression. However, there may be differential effects of intensive blood-pressure control in patients with and those without baseline proteinuria. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, and others.)


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis