Randomized Phase III Trial of Induction Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Followed by Surgery Versus Up-Front Surgery in Locally Advanced Resectable Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Lai-ping Zhong(IHI Corporation (United States)), Chen-ping Zhang(IHI Corporation (United States)), Guo-xin Ren(IHI Corporation (United States)), Wei Guo(IHI Corporation (United States)), William N. William(IHI Corporation (United States)), Jian Sun(IHI Corporation (United States)), Han-guang Zhu(IHI Corporation (United States)), Wen-yong Tu(IHI Corporation (United States)), Jiang LI(IHI Corporation (United States)), Yi-li Cai(IHI Corporation (United States)), Li-zhen Wang(IHI Corporation (United States)), Xin-dong Fan(IHI Corporation (United States)), Zhong-he Wang(IHI Corporation (United States)), Yong-jie Hu(IHI Corporation (United States)), Tong Ji(IHI Corporation (United States)), Wen-jun Yang(IHI Corporation (United States)), Weimin Ye(IHI Corporation (United States)), Jun Li(IHI Corporation (United States)), Yue He(IHI Corporation (United States)), Yan-an Wang(IHI Corporation (United States)), Li-Qun Xu(IHI Corporation (United States)), Bo-song Wang(IHI Corporation (United States)), Merrill S. Kies(IHI Corporation (United States)), J. Jack Lee(IHI Corporation (United States)), Jeffrey N. Myers(IHI Corporation (United States)), Zhiyuan Zhang(IHI Corporation (United States))
Journal of Clinical Oncology
November 6, 2012
Cited by 388Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF) followed by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus up-front surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective open-label phase III trial was conducted. Eligibility criteria included untreated stage III or IVA locally advanced resectable OSCC. Patients received two cycles of TPF induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5) followed by radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (54 to 66 Gy) versus up-front radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included local control and safety. RESULTS: Of the 256 patients enrolled onto this trial, 222 completed the full treatment protocol. There were no unexpected toxicities, and induction chemotherapy did not increase perioperative morbidity. The clinical response rate to induction chemotherapy was 80.6%. After a median follow-up of 30 months, there was no significant difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.977; 95% CI, 0.634 to 1.507; P = .918) or disease-free survival (HR, 0.974; 95% CI, 0.654 to 1.45; P = .897) between patients treated with and without TPF induction. Patients in the induction chemotherapy arm with a clinical response or favorable pathologic response (≤ 10% viable tumor cells) had superior OS and locoregional and distant control. CONCLUSION: Our study failed to demonstrate that TPF induction chemotherapy improves survival compared with up-front surgery in patients with resectable stage III or IVA OSCC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis