Isoprene emission rates under elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> in two field‐grown aspen clones differing in their sensitivity to O<sub>3</sub>
Carlo Calfapietra(Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth), Thomas D. Sharkey(Michigan State University), Francesco Loreto(Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection), Giuseppe Scarascia Mugnozza(Università degli Studi della Tuscia), David F. Karnosky(Università degli Studi della Tuscia)
Cited by 92
Related Papers
A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas
|Environmental Science & Policy|2017|1.2k
Forest response to elevated CO <sub>2</sub> is conserved across a broad range of productivity
|Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|2005|1k
The Urban Forest and Ecosystem Services: Impacts on Urban Water, Heat, and Pollution Cycles at the Tree, Street, and City Scale
|Journal of Environmental Quality|2016|858
Carbon Isotope Discrimination measured Concurrently with Gas Exchange to Investigate CO2 Diffusion in Leaves of Higher Plants
|Australian Journal of Plant Physiology|1986|695
Isoprene Emission from Plants: Why and How
|Annals of Botany|2007|687