Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Chemoprevention Trial of Selenium Supplementation in Patients With Resected Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ECOG 5597

Daniel D. Karp(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Sandra J. Lee(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Steven M. Keller(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Gail S. Wright(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Seena C. Aisner(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Steven A. Belinsky(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), David H. Johnson(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Michael R. Johnston(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Gary E. Goodman(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Gerald H. Clamon(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Gordon Okawara(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Randolph S. Marks(Mayo Clinic), Éric Fréchette(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Worta McCaskill‐Stevens(National Institutes of Health), Scott M. Lippman(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), John Ruckdeschel(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Fadlo R. Khuri(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
September 4, 2013
Cited by 129Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Selenium has been reported to have chemopreventive benefits in lung cancer. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the incidence of second primary tumors (SPTs) in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving selenium supplementation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with completely resected stage I NSCLC were randomly assigned to take selenized yeast 200 μg versus placebo daily for 48 months. Participation was 6 to 36 months postoperatively and required a negative mediastinal node biopsy, no excessive vitamin intake, normal liver function, negative chest x-ray, and no other evidence of recurrence. RESULTS: The first interim analysis in October 2009, with 46% of the projected end points accumulated, showed a trend in favor of the placebo group with a low likelihood that the trial would become positive; thus, the study was stopped. One thousand seven hundred seventy-two participants were enrolled, with 1,561 patients randomly assigned. Analysis was updated in June 2011 with the maturation of 54% of the planned end points. Two hundred fifty-two SPTs (from 224 patients) developed, of which 98 (from 97 patients) were lung cancer (38.9%). Lung and overall SPT incidence were 1.62 and 3.54 per 100 person-years, respectively, for selenium versus 1.30 and 3.39 per 100 person-years, respectively, for placebo (P = .294). Five-year disease-free survival was 74.4% for selenium recipients versus 79.6% for placebo recipients. Grade 1 to 2 toxicity occurred in 31% of selenium recipients and 26% of placebo recipients, and grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in less than 2% of selenium recipients versus 3% of placebo recipients. Compliance was excellent. No increase in diabetes mellitus or skin cancer was detected. CONCLUSION: Selenium was safe but conferred no benefit over placebo in the prevention of SPT in patients with resected NSCLC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis