Improved Survival of Left-sided Pancreas Cancer after Surgery

Junji Yamamoto(National Defense Medical College), Akio Saiura(The Cancer Institute Hospital), Reyce Santos Koga(The Cancer Institute Hospital), Makoto Seki(The Cancer Institute Hospital), M Katori(The Cancer Institute Hospital), You Kato(The Cancer Institute Hospital), Yasunari Sakamoto(The Cancer Institute Hospital), N. Kokudo(The University of Tokyo), Toshio Yamaguchi(The Cancer Institute Hospital)
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
April 2, 2010
Cited by 38

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Resective therapeutic strategy for left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma is open to debate. The post-resection outcomes and factors influencing post-resection survival for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of surgery. METHODS: A total of 73 patients with adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas who underwent resection between 1994 and June 2007 were evaluated for overall survival. RESULTS: Multiple malignancies were present in 34 of 73 patients (47%). Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates after surgery were 79%, 34%, and 30%, respectively. Presence of symptoms, multiple cancers and level of preoperative tumor marker did not influence post-resection survival. As for tumor characteristics, tumor size, histological tumor differentiation, retroperitoneal invasion, status of residual tumor and UICC staging represented significant prognostic indicators by univariate analysis. Gemcitabine, when administered as an adjuvant settings, strongly worked for improving post-resection outcome (5-year survival rate = 51%). Factors shown to have independent prognostic significance on multivariate analysis were tumor size (<3 vs. >or=3 cm), status of residual tumor (R0 vs. R1, 2), and postoperative administration of gemcitabine. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate patient selection and accurate surgical technique with postoperative adjuvant therapy could benefit survival of patients with carcinoma of the pancreas body and tail.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis