Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification

Rebecca Elstrom(Cancer Research Institute), Liang Guan(Cancer Research Institute), Gary Baker(Cancer Research Institute), Khozaim Nakhoda(Cancer Research Institute), Jo‐Anne Vergilio(Cancer Research Institute), Hongming Zhuang(Cancer Research Institute), Stephanie Pitsilos(Cancer Research Institute), Adam Bagg(Cancer Research Institute), Lisa Downs(Cancer Research Institute), Amit K. Mehrotra(Cancer Research Institute), Scott Y. H. Kim(Cancer Research Institute), Abass Alavi(Cancer Research Institute), Stephen J. Schuster(Cancer Research Institute)
Cited by 437Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated (18)fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans in 172 patients with lymphoma and correlated results with pathologic diagnosis using the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. In total, FDG-PET detected disease in at least one site in 161 patients (94%) and failed to detect disease in 11 patients (6%). The most frequent lymphoma diagnoses were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL; n = 51), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL; n = 47), follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 42), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL; n = 12), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; n = 7), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL; n = 5). FDG-PET detected disease in 100% of patients with LBCL and MCL and in 98% of patients with HL and FL. In contrast, FDG-PET detected disease in only 67% of MZL and 40% of PTCL. Comparison with bone marrow biopsies showed that FDG-PET was not reliable for detection of bone marrow involvement in any lymphoma subtype.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis