Neoadjuvant Treatment Response As an Early Response Indicator for Patients With Rectal Cancer

In Ja Park(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Y. Nancy You(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Atin Agarwal(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), John M. Skibber(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Miguel A. Rodrı́guez-Bigas(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Cathy Eng(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Barry W. Feig(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Prajnan Das(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Sunil Krishnan(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Christopher H. Crane(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Chung-Yuan Hu(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), George J. Chang(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
April 10, 2012
Cited by 497Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is associated with improved local control and may result in complete tumor response. Associations between tumor response and disease control following radical resection should be established before tumor response is used to evaluate treatment strategies. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare oncologic outcomes associated with the degree of pathologic response after chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with locally advanced (cT3-4 or cN+ by endorectal ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging) rectal carcinoma diagnosed from 1993 to 2008 at our institution and treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical resection were identified, and their records were retrospectively reviewed. The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis (DM), and local recurrence (LR) rates were compared among patients with complete (ypT0N0), intermediate (ypT1-2N0), or poor (ypT3-4 or N+) response by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: In all, 725 patients were classified by tumor response: complete (131; 18.1%), intermediate (210; 29.0%), and poor (384; 53.0%). Age, sex, cN stage, and tumor location were not related to tumor response. Tumor response (complete v intermediate v poor) was associated with 5-year RFS (90.5% v 78.7% v 58.5%; P < .001), 5-year DM rates (7.0% v 10.1% v 26.5%; P < .001), and 5-year LR only rates (0% v 1.4% v 4.4%; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing radical resection is an early surrogate marker and correlate to oncologic outcomes. These data provide guidance with response-stratified oncologic benchmarks for comparisons of novel treatment strategies.


Related Papers