The Interplay of Socioeconomic Status, Distance to Center, and Interdonor Service Area Travel on Kidney Transplant Access and Outcomes

David A. Axelrod(Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center), Nino Dzebisashvili(UCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels), Mark A. Schnitzler(UCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels), Paolo R. Salvalaggio(University of Washington), Dorry L. Segev, Sommer E. Gentry(United States Naval Academy), Janet E. Tuttle‐Newhall(UCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels), Krista L. Lentine(UCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels)
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
August 27, 2010
Cited by 237Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Variation in kidney transplant access across the United States may motivate relocation of patients with ability to travel to better-supplied areas. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We examined national transplant registry and U.S. Census data for kidney transplant candidates listed in 1999 to 2009 with a reported residential zip code (n = 203,267). Cox's regression was used to assess associations of socioeconomic status (SES), distance from residence to transplant center, and relocation to a different donation service area (DSA) with transplant access and outcomes. RESULTS: Patients in the highest SES quartile had increased access to transplant compared with those with lowest SES, driven strongly by 76% higher likelihood of living donor transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70 to 1.83). Waitlist death was reduced in high compared with low SES candidates (aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.89). High SES patients also experienced lower mortality after living and deceased donor transplant. Patients living farther from the transplant center had reduced access to deceased donor transplant and increased risk of post-transplant death. Inter-DSA travel was associated with a dramatic increase in deceased donor transplant access (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.00) and was predicted by high SES, white race, and longer deceased-donor allograft waiting time in initial DSA. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing disparities exist in kidney transplantation access and outcomes on the basis of geography and SES despite near-universal insurance coverage under Medicare. Inter-DSA travel improves access and is more common among high SES candidates.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis