Interleukin-2- and Interferon Alfa-2a-Based Immunochemotherapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospectively Randomized Trial of the German Cooperative Renal Carcinoma Chemoimmunotherapy Group (DGCIN)

Jens Atzpodien(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Hartmut Kirchner(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Udo Jonas(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Lothar Bergmann(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Harold C. Schott(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), H. Heynemann(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Paolo Fornara(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), S.A. Loening(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Jan Roigas(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Stefan C. Müller(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), H. Bodenstein(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), S. Pomer(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Bernd Metzner(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), U. Rebmann(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), R. Oberneder(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Michael Siebels(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), T Wandert(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), T. Puchberger(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Martina Reitz(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
February 24, 2004
Cited by 225Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospectively randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of three outpatient therapy regimens in 341 patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were stratified according to known clinical predictors and were subsequently randomly assigned. Treatment arms were: arm A (n = 132), subcutaneous interferon alfa-2a (sc-IFN-alpha-2a), subcutaneous interleukin-2 (sc-IL-2), and intravenous (IV) fluorouracil; arm B (n = 146): arm A treatment combined with per oral 13-cis-retinoic acid; and arm C (n = 63), sc-IFN-alpha-2a and IV vinblastine. RESULTS: Treatment (according to the standard 8-week Hannover Atzpodien regimen) arms A, B, and C yielded objective response rates of 31%, 26%, and 20%, respectively. Arm B, but not arm A, showed a significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with arm C (P =.0248). Both arm A (median overall survival, 25 months; P =.0440) and arm B (median overall survival, 27 months; P =.0227) led to significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with arm C (median OS, 16 months). All three sc-IFN-alpha-2a-based therapies were moderately or well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Our results established the safety and improved long-term therapeutic efficacy of sc-IL-2 plus sc-INF-alpha-2a-based outpatient immunochemotherapies, compared with sc-INF-alpha-2a/IV vinblastine.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis