Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports

Ian Jacobs(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Vinay Nadkarni(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), the ILCOR Task Force on Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Jan Bahr(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Robert A. Berg(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), John E. Billi(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Leo Bossaert(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Pascal Cassan(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Ashraf Coovadia(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Kate D’Este(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Judith Finn(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Henry R. Halperin(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Anthony J. Handley(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Johan Herlitz(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Robert W. Hickey(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Ahamed H. Idris(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Walter Kloeck(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Gregory Luke Larkin(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Mary E. Mancini(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Pip Mason(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Gregory Mears(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Koenraad G. Monsieurs(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), William Montgomery(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Peter T. Morley(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Graham Nichol(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Jerry P. Nolan(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Kazuo Okada(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Jeffrey M. Perlman(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Michael Shuster(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Petter Andreas Steen(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Fritz Sterz(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), James Tibballs(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Sérgio Timerman(Children's Hospital of Philadelphia), Tanya Lane Truitt, David Zideman
Circulation
November 22, 2004
Cited by 2,563Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Outcome after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation is dependent on critical interventions, particularly early defibrillation, effective chest compressions, and advanced life support. Utstein-style definitions and reporting templates have been used extensively in published studies of cardiac arrest, which has led to greater understanding of the elements of resuscitation practice and progress toward international consensus on science and resuscitation guidelines. Despite the development of Utstein templates to standardize research reports of cardiac arrest, international registries have yet to be developed. In April 2002, a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) met in Melbourne, Australia, to review worldwide experience with the Utstein definitions and reporting templates. The task force revised the core reporting template and definitions by consensus. Care was taken to build on previous definitions, changing data elements and operational definitions only on the basis of published data and experience derived from those registries that have used Utstein-style reporting. Attention was focused on decreasing the complexity of the existing templates and addressing logistical difficulties in collecting specific core and supplementary (ie, essential and desirable) data elements recommended by previous Utstein consensus conferences. Inconsistencies in terminology between in-hospital and out-of-hospital Utstein templates were also addressed. The task force produced a reporting tool for essential data that can be used for both quality improvement (registries) and research reports and that should be applicable to both adults and children. The revised and simplified template includes practical and succinct operational definitions. It is anticipated that the revised template will enable better and more accurate completion of all reports of cardiac arrest and resuscitation attempts. Problems with data definition, collection, linkage, confidentiality, management, and registry implementation are acknowledged and potential solutions offered. Uniform collection and tracking of registry data should enable better continuous quality improvement within every hospital, emergency medical services system, and community.


Related Papers