The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease

Kathryn A. Ellis(St Vincent's Hospital), Ashley I. Bush(University of Melbourne), David Darby(University of Melbourne), Daniela De Fazio(Mental Health Research Institute), Jonathan K. Foster(Edith Cowan University), Peter J. Hudson(Parks Victoria), Nicola T. Lautenschlager(University of Western Australia), Nat Lenzo(Hollywood Private Hospital), Ralph N. Martins(Edith Cowan University), Paul Maruff(University of Melbourne), Colin L. Masters(University of Melbourne), Andrew Milner, Kerryn E. Pike(University of Melbourne), Christopher C. Rowe(Austin Health), Greg Savage(Macquarie University), Cassandra Szoeke(Parks Victoria), Kevin Taddei(Hollywood Private Hospital), Victor L. Villemagne(Austin Health), Mark Woodward(Austin Health), David Ames(University of Melbourne)
International Psychogeriatrics
May 27, 2009
Cited by 971Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) flagship study of aging aimed to recruit 1000 individuals aged over 60 to assist with prospective research into Alzheimer's disease (AD). This paper describes the recruitment of the cohort and gives information about the study methodology, baseline demography, diagnoses, medical comorbidities, medication use, and cognitive function of the participants. METHODS: Volunteers underwent a screening interview, had comprehensive cognitive testing, gave 80 ml of blood, and completed health and lifestyle questionnaires. One quarter of the sample also underwent amyloid PET brain imaging with Pittsburgh compound B (PiB PET) and MRI brain imaging, and a subgroup of 10% had ActiGraph activity monitoring and body composition scanning. RESULTS: A total of 1166 volunteers were recruited, 54 of whom were excluded from further study due to comorbid disorders which could affect cognition or because of withdrawal of consent. Participants with AD (211) had neuropsychological profiles which were consistent with AD, and were more impaired than participants with mild cognitive impairment (133) or healthy controls (768), who performed within expected norms for age on neuropsychological testing. PiB PET scans were performed on 287 participants, 100 had DEXA scans and 91 participated in ActiGraph monitoring. CONCLUSION: The participants comprising the AIBL cohort represent a group of highly motivated and well-characterized individuals who represent a unique resource for the study of AD. They will be reassessed at 18-month intervals in order to determine the predictive utility of various biomarkers, cognitive parameters and lifestyle factors as indicators of AD, and as predictors of future cognitive decline.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis