Switching to Another SSRI or to Venlafaxine With or Without Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents With SSRI-Resistant Depression

David A. Brent(University of Pittsburgh), Graham J. Emslie, Gregory N. Clarke(Kaiser Permanente), Karen Dineen Wagner(The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston), Joan Rosenbaum Asarnow(University of California, Los Angeles), Marty Keller(John Brown University), Benedetto Vitiello(National Institutes of Health), Louise Ritz(National Institutes of Health), Satish Iyengar(University of Pittsburgh), Kaleab Z. Abebe(University of Pittsburgh), Boris Birmaher(University of Pittsburgh), Neal D. Ryan(University of Pittsburgh), Betsy D. Kennard, Carroll W. Hughes, Lynn DeBar(Kaiser Permanente), James T. McCracken(University of California, Los Angeles), Michael Strober(University of California, Los Angeles), Robert Suddath(University of California, Los Angeles), Anthony Spirito(John Brown University), Henrietta Leonard(John Brown University), Nadine Melhem(University of Pittsburgh), Giovanna Porta(University of Pittsburgh), Matthew Onorato(University of Pittsburgh), Jamie Zelazny(University of Pittsburgh)
JAMA
February 26, 2008
Cited by 696Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

CONTEXT: Only about 60% of adolescents with depression will show an adequate clinical response to an initial treatment trial with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). There are no data to guide clinicians on subsequent treatment strategy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative efficacy of 4 treatment strategies in adolescents who continued to have depression despite adequate initial treatment with an SSRI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trial of a clinical sample of 334 patients aged 12 to 18 years with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder that had not responded to a 2-month initial treatment with an SSRI, conducted at 6 US academic and community clinics from 2000-2006. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve weeks of: (1) switch to a second, different SSRI (paroxetine, citalopram, or fluoxetine, 20-40 mg); (2) switch to a different SSRI plus cognitive behavioral therapy; (3) switch to venlafaxine (150-225 mg); or (4) switch to venlafaxine plus cognitive behavioral therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement score of 2 or less (much or very much improved) and a decrease of at least 50% in the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R); and change in CDRS-R over time. RESULTS: Cognitive behavioral therapy plus a switch to either medication regimen showed a higher response rate (54.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 47%-62%) than a medication switch alone (40.5%; 95% CI, 33%-48%; P = .009), but there was no difference in response rate between venlafaxine and a second SSRI (48.2%; 95% CI, 41%-56% vs 47.0%; 95% CI, 40%-55%; P = .83). There were no differential treatment effects on change in the CDRS-R, self-rated depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, or on the rate of harm-related or any other adverse events. There was a greater increase in diastolic blood pressure and pulse and more frequent occurrence of skin problems during venlafaxine than SSRI treatment. CONCLUSIONS: For adolescents with depression not responding to an adequate initial treatment with an SSRI, the combination of cognitive behavioral therapy and a switch to another antidepressant resulted in a higher rate of clinical response than did a medication switch alone. However, a switch to another SSRI was just as efficacious as a switch to venlafaxine and resulted in fewer adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00018902.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis