The Classification of Glomerulonephritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Revisited

Jan J. Weening(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Vivette D. D’Agati(Columbia University), Melvin M. Schwartz(Rush University), Surya V. Seshan(Cornell University), Charles E. Alpers(University of Washington), Gerald B. Appel(Columbia University), James E. Balow(National Institutes of Health), Jan A. Bruijn(Leiden University), Terence Cook(Imperial College London), Franco Ferrario(Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo), Agnes B. Fogo(Vanderbilt University), Ellen M. Ginzler(SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University), Lee A. Hebert(The Ohio State University), Gary S. Hill(Hôpital Européen), Prue Hill(St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne), J. Charles Jennette(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Norella Kong(National University of Malaysia), Philippe Lesavre(Université Paris Cité), Michael D. Lockshin(Cornell University), Lai‐Meng Looi(University of Malaya), Hirofumi Makino(Okayama University), Luiz A. Moura(Universidade Federal de São Paulo), Michio Nagata(University of Tsukuba)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
February 1, 2004
Cited by 1,994Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The currently used classification reflects our understanding of the pathogenesis of the various forms of lupus nephritis, but clinicopathologic studies have revealed the need for improved categorization and terminology. Based on the 1982 classification published under the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO) and subsequent clinicopathologic data, we propose that class I and II be used for purely mesangial involvement (I, mesangial immune deposits without mesangial hypercellularity; II, mesangial immune deposits with mesangial hypercellularity); class III for focal glomerulonephritis (involving <50% of total number of glomeruli) with subdivisions for active and sclerotic lesions; class IV for diffuse glomerulonephritis (involving > or = 50% of total number of glomeruli) either with segmental (class IV-S) or global (class IV-G) involvement, and also with subdivisions for active and sclerotic lesions; class V for membranous lupus nephritis; and class VI for advanced sclerosing lesions]. Combinations of membranous and proliferative glomerulonephritis (i.e., class III and V or class IV and V) should be reported individually in the diagnostic line. The diagnosis should also include entries for any concomitant vascular or tubulointerstitial lesions. One of the main advantages of the current revised classification is that it provides a clear and unequivocal description of the various lesions and classes of lupus nephritis, allowing a better standardization and lending a basis for further clinicopathologic studies. We hope that this revision, which evolved under the auspices of the International Society of Nephrology and the Renal Pathology Society, will contribute to further advancement of the WHO classification.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis