Naive and Memory T Cells Induce Different Types of Graft-versus-Host Disease

Suparna Dutt(Stanford University), Diane Tseng(Stanford University), Joerg Ermann(Stanford University), Tracy I. George(Stanford University), Yin Ping Liu(Stanford University), Corrine R. Davis(Stanford University), C. Garrison Fathman(Stanford University), Samuel Strober(Stanford University)
The Journal of Immunology
November 1, 2007
Cited by 114Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare the ability of donor naive and alloantigen-primed effector memory T cells to induce graft-vs-host disease after bone marrow transplantation in MHC-mismatched irradiated host mice. Purified CD4(+) naive (CD62L(high)CD44(low)) T cells and CD4(+) effector memory (CD62L(low)CD44(high)) T cells obtained from unprimed donors and donors primed to host alloantigens, respectively, were injected into host mice, and the rapidity, severity, and pattern of tissue injury of graft-vs-host disease was assessed. Unexpectedly, the naive T cells induced a more acute and severe colitis than the primed memory cells. Whereas the naive T cells expressing CD62L and CCR7 lymph node homing receptors vigorously expanded in mesenteric lymph nodes and colon by day 6 after transplantation, the primed memory T cells without these receptors had 20- to 100-fold lower accumulation at this early time point. These differences were reflected in the significantly more rapid decline in survival and weight loss induced by naive T cells. The primed memory T cells had a greater capacity to induce chronic colitis and liver injury and secrete IL-2 and IFN-gamma in response to alloantigenic stimulation compared with memory T cells from unprimed donors. Nevertheless, the expected increase in potency as compared with naive T cells was not observed due to differences in the pattern and kinetics of tissue injury.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis