Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 3-year outcomes of self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis

Gian Paolo Ussia(Ferrarotto Hospital), Marco Barbanti(Ferrarotto Hospital), Anna Sonia Petronio(University of Pisa), Giuseppe Tarantini(University of Padua), Federica Ettori(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia), Antonio Colombo(San Raffaele University of Rome), Roberto Violini(Carlo Forlanini Hospital), Angelo Ramondo(Ospedale San Bassiano), Gennaro Santoro(Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi), Silvio Klugmann(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda), Francesco Bedogni(Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio), Francesco Maisano(San Raffaele University of Rome), A Marzocchi(University of Bologna), Arnaldo Poli(Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Civile di Legnano), Marco De Carlo(University of Pisa), Massimo Napodano(University of Padua), Claudia Fiorina(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia), Federico De Marco(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda), David Antoniucci(Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi), Emanuela De Cillis, Davide Capodanno(Etna Biotech (Italy)), Corrado Tamburino(Etna Biotech (Italy)), on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators
European Heart Journal
January 12, 2012
Cited by 285Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

AIMS: The paucity of evidences about the long-term durability of currently available transcatheter prostheses is one of the main issues of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to assess 3-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI with the third generation CoreValve prosthesis (Medtronic Incorporation, MN, USA). METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Italian CoreValve registry, 181 who underwent TAVI from June 2007 to August 2008 and eligible for 3-year follow-up were analysed. All outcomes were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium. All-cause mortality at 1, 2, and 3 years was 23.6, 30.3, and 34.8%, respectively. Cardiovascular death at 1, 2, and 3 years was 11.2, 12.1, and 13.5%, respectively. The actuarial survival free from a composite of death, major stroke, myocardial infarction, and life-threatening bleeding was 69.6% at 1 year, 63.5% at 2 years, and 59.7% at 3 years. Patients with renal insufficiency had a higher mortality at 3-year follow-up (49.0 vs. 29.2%, P = 0.007); moreover, patients experiencing post-procedural major or life-threatening bleeding had a higher rate of mortality already seen at 30 days (21.6 vs. 2.8%; P < 0.001) and this result was sustained at 3-year follow-up (62.2 vs. 27.7%; P < 0.001). Mean pressure gradients decreased from 52.2 ± 18.1 mmHg (pre-TAVI) to 10.3 ± 3.1 mmHg (1-year post-TAVI) (P < 0.001); aortic valve area increased from 0.6 ± 0.2 cm(2) (pre-TAVI) to 1.8 ± 0.4 cm(2) (1-year post-TAVI); these results remained stable over the 3 years of follow-up. Paravalvular leak was observed in the majority of patients. There were no cases of progression to moderate or severe regurgitation. No cases of structural valve deterioration were observed. CONCLUSION: This multicentre study demonstrates that TAVI with the 18-Fr CoreValve ReValving System is associated with sustained clinical and functional cardiovascular benefits in high-risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis up to 3-year follow-up. Non-cardiac causes accounted for the majority of deaths at follow-up.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis