Efficacy, safety and tolerability of linezolid containing regimens in treating MDR-TB and XDR-TB: systematic review and meta-analysis

Giovanni Sotgiu(University of Sassari), Rosella Centis(World Health Organization - Pakistan), Lia D’Ambrosio(World Health Organization - Pakistan), Jan-William C. Alffenaar, Holly Anger(New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene), José A. Caminero(Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín), Paolo Castiglia(University of Sassari), Saverio De Lorenzo, Giovanni Ferrara(University of Perugia), Won‐Jung Koh(Sungkyunkwan University), Giesela F. Schecter, Tae Sun Shim(University of Ulsan), Rupak Singla(LRS Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases), Alena Skrahina, Antonio Spanevello(University of Insubria), Zarir Udwadia(P. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre), M.P. Gil Villar, Elisabetta Zampogna(World Health Organization - Pakistan), Jean-Pierre Zellweger(University of Lausanne), Alimuddin Zumla(University College London), Giovanni Battista Migliori(World Health Organization - Pakistan)
European Respiratory Journal
April 10, 2012
Cited by 411Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Linezolid is used off-label to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in absence of systematic evidence. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy, safety and tolerability of linezolid-containing regimes based on individual data analysis. 12 studies (11 countries from three continents) reporting complete information on safety, tolerability, efficacy of linezolid-containing regimes in treating MDR-TB cases were identified based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using the individual data of 121 patients with a definite treatment outcome (cure, completion, death or failure). Most MDR-TB cases achieved sputum smear (86 (92.5%) out of 93) and culture (100 (93.5%) out of 107) conversion after treatment with individualised regimens containing linezolid (median (inter-quartile range) times for smear and culture conversions were 43.5 (21-90) and 61 (29-119) days, respectively) and 99 (81.8%) out of 121 patients were successfully treated. No significant differences were detected in the subgroup efficacy analysis (daily linezolid dosage ≤ 600 mg versus >600 mg). Adverse events were observed in 63 (58.9%) out of 107 patients, of which 54 (68.4%) out of 79 were major adverse events that included anaemia (38.1%), peripheral neuropathy (47.1%), gastro-intestinal disorders (16.7%), optic neuritis (13.2%) and thrombocytopenia (11.8%). The proportion of adverse events was significantly higher when the linezolid daily dosage exceeded 600 mg. The study results suggest an excellent efficacy but also the necessity of caution in the prescription of linezolid.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis