Association between change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: systematic review and meta-regression analysis

Matthias Briel(University Hospital of Basel), Ignacio Ferreira‐González(Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública), John J. You(McMaster University), P. J Karanicolas(Western University), Elie Akl(University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Ping Wu(Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine), Boris Blechacz(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Dirk Bassler(University Children's Hospital Tübingen), X. Wei(McMaster University), Asheer Sharman(McMaster University), Irene Whitt(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), S. Alves da Silva(Hospital Pró-Cardíaco), Zara Khalid(McMaster University), Alain Nordmann(University Hospital of Basel), Qi Zhou(McMaster University), Stephen D. Walter(McMaster University), Noah Vale(McMaster University), Neera Bhatnagar(McMaster University), C. O’Regan(Pfizer (United Kingdom)), Edward J. Mills(St. Paul's Hospital), Heiner C. Bucher(University Hospital of Basel), Víctor M. Montori(WinnMed), Gordon Guyatt(McMaster University)
BMJ
February 16, 2009
Cited by 488Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between treatment induced change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and total death, coronary heart disease death, and coronary heart disease events (coronary heart disease death and non-fatal myocardial infarction) adjusted for changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol and drug class in randomised trials of lipid modifying interventions. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Central, CINAHL, and AMED to October 2006 supplemented by contact with experts in the field. STUDY SELECTION: In teams of two, reviewers independently determined eligibility of randomised trials that tested lipid modifying interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk, reported high density lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality or myocardial infarctions separately for treatment groups, and treated and followed participants for at least six months. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Using standardised, pre-piloted forms, reviewers independently extracted relevant information from each article. The change in lipid concentrations for each trial and the weighted risk ratios for clinical outcomes were calculated. RESULTS: The meta-regression analysis included 108 randomised trials involving 299 310 participants at risk of cardiovascular events. All analyses that adjusted for changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol showed no association between treatment induced change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk ratios for coronary heart disease deaths, coronary heart disease events, or total deaths. With all trials included, change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol explained almost no variability (<1%) in any of the outcomes. The change in the quotient of low density lipoprotein cholesterol and high density lipoprotein cholesterol did not explain more of the variability in any of the outcomes than did the change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol alone. For a 10 mg/dl (0.26 mmol/l) reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol, the relative risk reduction was 7.2% (95% confidence interval 3.1% to 11%; P=0.001) for coronary heart disease deaths, 7.1% (4.5% to 9.8%; P<0.001) for coronary heart disease events, and 4.4% (1.6% to 7.2%; P=0.002) for total deaths, when adjusted for change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and drug class. CONCLUSIONS: Available data suggest that simply increasing the amount of circulating high density lipoprotein cholesterol does not reduce the risk of coronary heart disease events, coronary heart disease deaths, or total deaths. The results support reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol as the primary goal for lipid modifying interventions.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis