Prevalence and incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome in US working populations: pooled analysis of six prospective studies

Ann Marie Dale(Washington University in St. Louis), Carisa Harris‐Adamson(Samuel Merritt University), David Rempel(University of California, San Francisco), Fred Gerr(Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions), Kurt T. Hegmann(United States Department of State), Barbara Silverstein(National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health), Susan Burt(University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee), Arun Garg(University of California, Berkeley), Jay Kapellusch(University of California, Berkeley), Linda Merlino(University of Iowa), Matthew S. Thiese(United States Department of State), Ellen A. Eisen, Bradley Evanoff(Washington University in St. Louis)
Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
February 19, 2013
Cited by 324Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Most studies of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) incidence and prevalence among workers have been limited by small sample sizes or restricted to a small subset of jobs. We established a common CTS case definition and then pooled CTS prevalence and incidence data across six prospective studies of musculoskeletal outcomes to measure CTS frequency and allow better studies of etiology. METHODS: Six research groups collected prospective data at > 50 workplaces including symptoms characteristic of CTS and electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) of the median and ulnar nerves across the dominant wrist. While study designs and the timing of data collection varied across groups, we were able to create a common CTS case definition incorporating both symptoms and EDS results from data that were collected in all studies. RESULTS: At the time of enrollment, 7.8% of 4321 subjects met our case definition and were considered prevalent cases of CTS. During 8833 person-years of follow-up, an additional 204 subjects met the CTS case definition for an overall incidence rate of 2.3 CTS cases per 100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: Both prevalent and incident CTS were common in data pooled across multiple studies and sites. The large number of incident cases in this prospective study provides adequate power for future exposure-response analyses to identify work- and non-work-related risk factors for CTS. The prospective nature allows determination of the temporal relations necessary for causal inference.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis