Everolimus with Optimized Cyclosporine Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of Two Randomized Studies

Š Vı́tko(Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine), Hélio Tedesco‐Silva(Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão), Josette Eris(Royal Prince Alfred Hospital), Julio Pascual(Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal), John Whelchel(Piedmont Atlanta Hospital), John C. Magee(University of Michigan), Scott B. Campbell(Princess Alexandra Hospital), G Civati(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda), B. Bourbigot(Hôpital Maison Blanche), Gentil Alves Filho(Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)), John P. Leone(Tampa General Hospital), Valter Duro Garcı́a, Paolo Rigotti, Ronaldo Esmeraldo(Hospital Geral de Fortaleza), V. Cambi(Ospedale Maggiore), T Haas(Novartis (Switzerland)), Annette Jappe(Novartis (Switzerland)), Peter Bernhardt(Novartis (Switzerland)), Johanna Geissler(Novartis (Switzerland)), Nathalie Cretin(Novartis (Switzerland))
American Journal of Transplantation
April 1, 2004
Cited by 257Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Two prospective, randomized studies evaluated everolimus 1.5 vs. 3 mg/day with steroids and low-exposure cyclosporine (CsA) (C2 monitoring) in de novo renal transplant patients. Everolimus dosing was adjusted to maintain a minimum trough level of 3 ng/mL. Study 1 (A2306; n=237) had no induction therapy; in Study 2 (A2307; n=256) basiliximab was administered (Days 0 and 4). The primary endpoint was renal function at 6 months. CsA C2 target levels, initially 1200 ng/mL in Study 1 and 600 ng/mL in Study 2, were tapered over time post-transplant. Median creatinine levels in Study 1 were 133 and 132 micromol/L at 6 months in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups, respectively, and 130 micromol/L in both groups in Study 2. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 25.0% and 15.2% of patients in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups in Study 1, and 13.7% and 15.1% in Study 2. Incidence of BPAR was significantly higher in patients with an everolimus trough <3 ng/mL. There were no significant between-group differences in the composite endpoint of BPAR, graft loss or death, nor any significant between-group differences in adverse events in either study. Concentration-controlled everolimus with low-exposure CsA provided effective protection against rejection with good renal function.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis