Metastasis-Associated Gene Expression Changes Predict Poor Outcomes in Patients with Dukes Stage B and C Colorectal Cancer

Robert N. Jorissen(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Peter Gibbs(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Michael Christie(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Saurabh Prakash(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Lara Lipton(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Jayesh Desai(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Rachel Kerr(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Lauri A. Aaltonen(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Diego Arango(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Mogens Kruhøffer(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Torben F. Ørntoft(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Claus L. Andersen(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Mike Gruidl(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Vidya Kamath(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Steven A. Eschrich(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Timothy J. Yeatman(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Oliver M. Sieber(The Royal Melbourne Hospital)
Clinical Cancer Research
December 8, 2009
Cited by 441Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer prognosis is currently predicted from pathologic staging, providing limited discrimination for Dukes stage B and C disease. Additional markers for outcome are required to help guide therapy selection for individual patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A multisite single-platform microarray study was done on 553 colorectal cancers. Gene expression changes were identified between stage A and D tumors (three training sets) and assessed as a prognosis signature in stage B and C tumors (independent test and external validation sets). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight genes showed reproducible expression changes between three sets of stage A and D cancers. Using consistent genes, stage B and C cancers clustered into two groups resembling early-stage and metastatic tumors. A Prediction Analysis of Microarray algorithm was developed to classify individual intermediate-stage cancers into stage A-like/good prognosis or stage D-like/poor prognosis types. For stage B patients, the treatment adjusted hazard ratio for 6-year recurrence in individuals with stage D-like cancers was 10.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-80.0; P = 0.011). For stage C patients, the adjusted hazard ratio was 2.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.6; P = 0.016). Similar results were obtained for an external set of stage B and C patients. The prognosis signature was enriched for downregulated immune response genes and upregulated cell signaling and extracellular matrix genes. Accordingly, sparse tumor infiltration with mononuclear chronic inflammatory cells was associated with poor outcome in independent patients. CONCLUSIONS: Metastasis-associated gene expression changes can be used to refine traditional outcome prediction, providing a rational approach for tailoring treatments to subsets of patients. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(24):7642-51).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis