Considerations in the development of circulating tumor cell technology for clinical use

David Parkinson(Enterprise Community Partners), Nicholas C. Dracopoli(Johnson & Johnson (United States)), Brenda Gumbs Petty(CCS Associates (United States)), Carolyn C. Compton(Critical Path Institute), Massimo Cristofanilli(Fox Chase Cancer Center), Albert Deisseroth(Center for Drug Evaluation and Research), Daniel F. Hayes(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), Gordon F. Kapke(Covance (United States)), Prasanna Kumar(Daiichi-Sankyo (South Korea)), Jerry Lee(National Cancer Institute), Minetta C. Liu(Georgetown University), Robert McCormack(IDEX Corporation (United States)), Stanislaw M. Mikulski(Ono Pharmaceutical (United States)), Larry A. Nagahara(National Cancer Institute), Klaus Pantel(University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf), Sonia Pearson‐White(Foundation for the National Institutes of Health), Elizabeth A. Punnoose, Lori Roadcap(GlaxoSmithKline (United States)), Andrew E. Schade(Eli Lilly (United States)), Howard I. Scher(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Caroline C. Sigman(CCS Associates (United States)), Gary J. Kelloff(National Institutes of Health)
Journal of Translational Medicine
July 2, 2012
Cited by 327Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

This manuscript summarizes current thinking on the value and promise of evolving circulating tumor cell (CTC) technologies for cancer patient diagnosis, prognosis, and response to therapy, as well as accelerating oncologic drug development. Moving forward requires the application of the classic steps in biomarker development-analytical and clinical validation and clinical qualification for specific contexts of use. To that end, this review describes methods for interactive comparisons of proprietary new technologies, clinical trial designs, a clinical validation qualification strategy, and an approach for effectively carrying out this work through a public-private partnership that includes test developers, drug developers, clinical trialists, the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and the US National Cancer Institute (NCI).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis