The London Position Statement of the World Congress of Gastroenterology on Biological Therapy for IBD With the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization: When to Start, When to Stop, Which Drug to Choose, and How to Predict Response?

Geert D’Haens(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Remo Panaccione(University of Calgary), Peter Higgins(University of Michigan), Séverine Vermeire(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Miquel A. Gassull(Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol), Yehuda Chowers(Rambam Health Care Campus), Stephen B. Hanauer(University of Chicago Medical Center), Hans Herfarth(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Daan W. Hommes(Leiden University Medical Center), Michael A. Kamm(St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne), Robert Löfberg(University of Calgary), A Quary(King Abdulaziz University), Bruce E. Sands(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Ajit Sood(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), G Watermayer(Rambam Health Care Campus), Bret A. Lashner(Cleveland Clinic), Marc Lémann(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Scott E. Plevy(University of North Carolina Health Care), Walter Reinisch(University of Calgary), Stefan Schreiber(University of Calgary), Corey A. Siegel(Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center), Stephen R. Targan(Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), Mamoru Watanabe(Tokyo Medical and Dental University), Brian G. Feagan(Western University), William J. Sandborn(Mayo Clinic), Jean‐Frédéric Colombel(University of Calgary), Simon Travis(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
November 2, 2010
Cited by 408

Abstract

The advent of biological therapy has revolutionized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care. Nonetheless, not all patients require biological therapy. Selection of patients depends on clinical characteristics, previous response to other medical therapy, and comorbid conditions. Availability, reimbursement guidelines, and patient preferences guide the choice of first-line biological therapy for luminal Crohn's disease (CD). Infliximab (IFX) has the most extensive clinical trial data, but other biological agents (adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab pegol (CZP), and natalizumab (NAT)) appear to have similar benefits in CD. Steroid-refractory, steroid-dependent, or complex fistulizing CD are indications for starting biological therapy, after surgical drainage of any sepsis. For fistulizing CD, the efficacy of IFX for inducing fistula closure is best documented. Unique risks of NAT account for its labeling as a second-line biological agent in some countries. Patients who respond to induction therapy benefit from systematic re-treatment. The combination of IFX with azathioprine is better than monotherapy for induction of remission and mucosal healing up to 1 year in patients who are naïve to both agents. Whether this applies to other agents remains unknown. IFX is also effective for treatment-refractory, moderate, or severely active ulcerative colitis. Patients who have a diminished or loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy may respond to dose adjustment of the same agent or switching to another agent. Careful consideration should be given to the reasons for loss of response. There are insufficient data to make recommendations on when to stop anti-TNF therapy. Preliminary evidence suggests that a substantial proportion of patients in clinical remission for >1 year, without signs of active inflammation can remain in remission after stopping treatment.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis