Randomized, Phase II Study of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Inhibitor IMC-A12, With or Without Cetuximab, in Patients With Cetuximab- or Panitumumab-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Diane Reidy‐Lagunes(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Efsevia Vakiani(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Marwan Fakih(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Muhammad Wasif Saif(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), J. Randolph Hecht(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Noah Goodman-Davis(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Ellen Hollywood(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Jinru Shia(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Jonathan Schwartz(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Kumari Chandrawansa(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Aruna Dontabhaktuni(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Hagop Youssoufian(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), David B. Solit(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), Leonard B. Saltz(Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
August 17, 2010
Cited by 139Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of IMC-A12, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that blocks insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF-1R), as monotherapy or in combination with cetuximab in patients with metastatic refractory anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mAb colorectal cancer. METHODS: A randomized, phase II study was performed in which patients in arm A received IMC-A12 10 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks, while patients in arm B received this same dose of IMC-A12 plus cetuximab 500 mg/m(2) IV every 2 weeks. Subsequently, arm C (same combination treatment as arm B) was added to include patients who had disease control on a prior anti-EGFR mAb and wild-type KRAS tumors. Archived pretreatment tumor tissue was obtained when possible for KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF genotyping, and immunohistochemistry was obtained for pAKT as well as IGF-1R. RESULTS: Overall, 64 patients were treated (median age, 61 years; range, 40 to 84 years): 23 patients in arm A, 21 in arm B, and 20 in arm C. No antitumor activity was seen in the 23 patients treated with IMC-A12 monotherapy. Of the 21 patients randomly assigned to IMC-A12 plus cetuximab, one patient (with KRAS wild type) achieved a partial response, with disease control lasting 6.5 months. Arm C (all patients with KRAS wild type), however, showed no additional antitumor activity. Serious adverse events thought possibly related to IMC-A12 included a grade 2 infusion-related reaction (2%; one of 64 patients), thrombocytopenia (2%; one of 64 patients), grade 3 hyperglycemia (2%; one of 64 patients), and grade 1 pyrexia (2%, one of 64 patients). CONCLUSION: IMC-A12 alone or in combination with cetuximab was insufficient to warrant additional study in patients with colorectal cancer refractory to EGFR inhibitors.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis