A Multicenter Trial of Prolonged Prone Ventilation in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Jordi Mancebo(Hospital de Sabadell), Rafael Fernández(Hospital de Sabadell), Lluís Blanch(Hospital de Sabadell), Gemma Rialp(Hospital de Sabadell), Federico Gordo(Hospital de Sabadell), Miquel Ferrer(Hospital de Sabadell), Fernando Rodríguez(Hospital de Sabadell), Pau Garro(Hospital de Sabadell), Pilar Ricart(Hospital de Sabadell), Immaculada Vallverdú(Hospital de Sabadell), Ignasi Gich(Hospital de Sabadell), José Rozado(Hospital de Sabadell), P. Saura(Hospital de Sabadell), Guillermo Domínguez‐Cherit(Hospital de Sabadell), Alfons Bonet(Hospital de Sabadell), Richard Albert(Hospital de Sabadell)
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
March 23, 2006
Cited by 562

Abstract

RATIONALE: Ventilation in the prone position for about 7 h/d in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute lung injury, or acute respiratory failure does not decrease mortality. Whether it is beneficial to administer prone ventilation early, and for longer periods of time, is unknown. METHODS: We enrolled 136 patients within 48 h of tracheal intubation for severe ARDS, 60 randomized to supine and 76 to prone ventilation. Guidelines were established for ventilator settings and weaning. The prone group was targeted to receive continuous prone ventilation treatment for 20 h/d. RESULTS: The intensive care unit mortality was 58% (35/60) in the patients ventilated supine and 43% (33/76) in the patients ventilated prone (p = 0.12). The latter had a higher simplified acute physiology score II at inclusion. Multivariate analysis showed that simplified acute physiology score II at inclusion (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; p < 0.001), number of days elapsed between ARDS diagnosis and inclusion (OR, 2.83; p < 0.001), and randomization to supine position (OR, 2.53; p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for mortality. A total of 718 turning procedures were done, and prone position was applied for a mean of 17 h/d for a mean of 10 d. A total of 28 complications were reported, and most were rapidly reversible. CONCLUSION: Prone ventilation is feasible and safe, and may reduce mortality in patients with severe ARDS when it is initiated early and applied for most of the day.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis