Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial

Mário Bernardo(University of Lisbon), Timothy A. DeRouen(University of Washington), Michael D. Martin(Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Brian G. Leroux(Public Health – Seattle & King County), Jorge Leitão(Universidade Católica Portuguesa), Tessa Rue(University of Washington), Henrique Luís(University of Lisbon)
The Journal of the American Dental Association
June 1, 2007
10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265
Cited by 584

Related Papers

Transfusion of Plasma, Platelets, and Red Blood Cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 Ratio and Mortality in Patients With Severe Trauma
|JAMA|2015|2.5k
A Cohort Study of the Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or 3 in Relation to Papillomavirus Infection
|New England Journal of Medicine|1992|952
Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations.
|Circulation|1979|674
Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis
|American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology|1988|557
A Covariance Estimator for GEE with Improved Small‐Sample Properties
|Biometrics|2001|536