Comparison of mRNA Splicing Assay Protocols across Multiple Laboratories: Recommendations for Best Practice in Standardized Clinical Testing

Phillip J Whiley(The University of Queensland), Miguel de la Hoya(Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Mads Thomassen(Odense University Hospital), Alexandra Becker(University of Cologne), Rita D. Brandão(Maastricht University Medical Centre), Inge Søkilde Pedersen(Aalborg University Hospital), Marco Montagna(Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Mireia Menéndez(Institut Català d'Oncologia), Francisco Quiles(Institut Català d'Oncologia), Sara Gutiérrez‐Enríquez(Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Kim De Leeneer(Ghent University Hospital), Anna Tenés(Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Gemma Montalban(Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Demis Tserpelis(Maastricht University Medical Centre), Toshio F. Yoshimatsu(University of Chicago Medical Center), Carole Tirapo(Délégation Paris 5), Michela Raponi(Southampton General Hospital), Trinidad Caldés(Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Ana Blanco(Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica), Marta Santamariña(Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), Lucia Guidugli(Mayo Clinic), Gorka Ruíz de Garibay(Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Ming Wong(The University of Melbourne), Mariella Tancredi(University of Pisa), Laura Fachal(Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica), Yuan Chun Ding(City of Hope), Torben A. Kruse(Odense University Hospital), Vanessa Lattimore(University of Otago), Ava Kwong(Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital), Tsun Leung Chan(Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital), Mara Colombo(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Giovanni De Vecchi(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Maria A. Caligo(The University of Melbourne), Diana Baralle(Southampton General Hospital), Conxi Lázaro(Institut Català d'Oncologia), Fergus J. Couch(Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), Paolo Radice(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Melissa C. Southey(Mayo Clinic), Susan L. Neuhausen(City of Hope), Claude Houdayer(Délégation Paris 5), Jim Fackenthal(University of Chicago Medical Center), Thomas van Overeem Hansen(Copenhagen University Hospital), Ana Vega(Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica), Orland Dı́ez(Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Rien Blok(Maastricht University Medical Centre), Kathleen Claes(Ghent University Hospital), Barbara Wappenschmidt(University of Cologne), Logan C. Walker(University of Otago), Amanda B. Spurdle(QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute), Melissa A. Brown(The University of Queensland)
Clinical Chemistry
November 8, 2013
Cited by 69Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of unclassified sequence variants in cancer predisposition genes is essential for clinical management and depends on a multifactorial analysis of clinical, genetic, pathologic, and bioinformatic variables and assays of transcript length and abundance. The integrity of assay data in turn relies on appropriate assay design, interpretation, and reporting. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter investigation to compare mRNA splicing assay protocols used by members of the ENIGMA (Evidence-Based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) consortium. We compared similarities and differences in results derived from analysis of a panel of breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) and breast cancer 2, early onset (BRCA2) gene variants known to alter splicing (BRCA1: c.135-1G>T, c.591C>T, c.594-2A>C, c.671-2A>G, and c.5467+5G>C and BRCA2: c.426-12_8delGTTTT, c.7988A>T, c.8632+1G>A, and c.9501+3A>T). Differences in protocols were then assessed to determine which elements were critical in reliable assay design. RESULTS: PCR primer design strategies, PCR conditions, and product detection methods, combined with a prior knowledge of expected alternative transcripts, were the key factors for accurate splicing assay results. For example, because of the position of primers and PCR extension times, several isoforms associated with BRCA1, c.594-2A>C and c.671-2A>G, were not detected by many sites. Variation was most evident for the detection of low-abundance transcripts (e.g., BRCA2 c.8632+1G>A Δ19,20 and BRCA1 c.135-1G>T Δ5q and Δ3). Detection of low-abundance transcripts was sometimes addressed by using more analytically sensitive detection methods (e.g., BRCA2 c.426-12_8delGTTTT ins18bp). CONCLUSIONS: We provide recommendations for best practice and raise key issues to consider when designing mRNA assays for evaluation of unclassified sequence variants.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis