Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm

Bo Zhang(Washington University in St. Louis), Yan Zhou(Harbin University of Science and Technology), Nan Lin(Washington University in St. Louis), Rebecca F. Lowdon(Washington University in St. Louis), Chibo Hong(University of California, San Francisco), Raman P. Nagarajan(University of California, San Francisco), Jeffrey B. Cheng(University of California, San Francisco), Daofeng Li(Washington University in St. Louis), Michael Stevens(Washington University in St. Louis), Hyung Joo Lee(Washington University in St. Louis), Xiaoyun Xing(Washington University in St. Louis), Jia Zhou(Washington University in St. Louis), Vasavi Sundaram(Washington University in St. Louis), GiNell Elliott(Washington University in St. Louis), Junchen Gu(Washington University in St. Louis), Taoping Shi(Washington University in St. Louis), Philippe Gascard(University of California, San Francisco), Mahvash Sigaroudinia(University of California, San Francisco), Thea D. Tlsty(University of California, San Francisco), Theresa A. Kadlecek(University of California, San Francisco), Arthur Weiss(University of California, San Francisco), Henriette O’Geen(University of California, Davis), Peggy Farnham(University of Southern California), Cécile L. Maire(Harvard University), Keith L. Ligon(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Pamela A. F. Madden(Washington University in St. Louis), Angela Tam(BC Cancer Agency), Richard A. Moore(BC Cancer Agency), Martin Hirst(BC Cancer Agency), Marco A. Marra(BC Cancer Agency), Baoxue Zhang(Northeast Normal University), J Costello(University of California, San Francisco), Ting Wang(Washington University in St. Louis)
Genome Research
June 26, 2013
Cited by 202Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and tissue-specific gene expression. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DNA methylomes. This includes one of the most widely applied technologies for measuring DNA methylation: methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq), coupled with a complementary method, methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sequencing (MRE-seq). A computational approach that integrates data from these two different but complementary assays and predicts methylation differences between samples has been unavailable. Here, we present a novel integrative statistical framework M&M (for integration of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq) that dynamically scales, normalizes, and combines MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to detect differentially methylated regions. Using sample-matched whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) as a gold standard, we demonstrate superior accuracy and reproducibility of M&M compared to existing analytical methods for MeDIP-seq data alone. M&M leverages the complementary nature of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to allow rapid comparative analysis between whole methylomes at a fraction of the cost of WGBS. Comprehensive analysis of nineteen human DNA methylomes with M&M reveals distinct DNA methylation patterns among different tissue types, cell types, and individuals, potentially underscoring divergent epigenetic regulation at different scales of phenotypic diversity. We find that differential DNA methylation at enhancer elements, with concurrent changes in histone modifications and transcription factor binding, is common at the cell, tissue, and individual levels, whereas promoter methylation is more prominent in reinforcing fundamental tissue identities.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis