Albumin Replacement in Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock

Pietro Caironi(University of Milan), Gianni Tognoni(Mario Negri Sud Foundation), Serge Masson(Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research), Roberto Fumagalli(University of Milano-Bicocca), Antonio Pesenti(University of Milano-Bicocca), Marilena Romero(Mario Negri Sud Foundation), Caterina Fanizza(Mario Negri Sud Foundation), Luisa Caspani(Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico), Stefano Faenza(IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola), Giacomo Grasselli(Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo), Gaetano Iapichino(University of Milan), Massimo Antonelli(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Vieri Parrini(Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze), Gilberto Fiore, Roberto Latini(Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research), Luciano Gattinoni(University of Milan)
New England Journal of Medicine
March 18, 2014
Cited by 1,315Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have suggested the potential advantages of albumin administration in patients with severe sepsis, its efficacy has not been fully established. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned 1818 patients with severe sepsis, in 100 intensive care units (ICUs), to receive either 20% albumin and crystalloid solution or crystalloid solution alone. In the albumin group, the target serum albumin concentration was 30 g per liter or more until discharge from the ICU or 28 days after randomization. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 28 days. Secondary outcomes were death from any cause at 90 days, the number of patients with organ dysfunction and the degree of dysfunction, and length of stay in the ICU and the hospital. RESULTS: During the first 7 days, patients in the albumin group, as compared with those in the crystalloid group, had a higher mean arterial pressure (P=0.03) and lower net fluid balance (P<0.001). The total daily amount of administered fluid did not differ significantly between the two groups (P=0.10). At 28 days, 285 of 895 patients (31.8%) in the albumin group and 288 of 900 (32.0%) in the crystalloid group had died (relative risk in the albumin group, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.14; P=0.94). At 90 days, 365 of 888 patients (41.1%) in the albumin group and 389 of 893 (43.6%) in the crystalloid group had died (relative risk, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.05; P=0.29). No significant differences in other secondary outcomes were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe sepsis, albumin replacement in addition to crystalloids, as compared with crystalloids alone, did not improve the rate of survival at 28 and 90 days. (Funded by the Italian Medicines Agency; ALBIOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00707122.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis